RE: [PATCH V3 6/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client

Hefty, Sean
2010-12-20T19:16:59Z

> Hmm, I was under the impression that sockaddr_storage was what Sean had
> asked for.
> Sean, is sockaddr_in6/sockaddr_in good enough?

I was asking that the message structure be large enough to contain sockaddr_storage. Jason suggested specifying the size separately, which also works. My real concern is that the patches for AF_IB support define sockaddr_ib which is larger than sockaddr_in6.

- Sean