From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH/libmlx] Set the ibv_wc.opcode even if the wc is an error wc Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:28:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4D771E0F.7040402@mellanox.com> References: <20110309042613.GA21606@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110309042613.GA21606-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Roland Dreier , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 3/9/2011 6:26 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Roland: I don't have a PRM to check if this is correct for the chip, but > it is definately in line with what the IBA expects to happen here. Hi Jason, I've been taught that by IBTA if the completion isn't successful then the only valid WC field is the opcode, isn't that correct? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html