From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: rdma_get_cm_event() vs ibv_async_event() Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:45:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4D91B85C.1080106@mellanox.com> References: <1301052615.2192.15.camel@deela.quest-ce.net> <1301059658.2192.23.camel@deela.quest-ce.net> <1301391461.2192.41.camel@deela.quest-ce.net> <4D91B107.2040007@mellanox.com> <1301394815.2193.2.camel@deela.quest-ce.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1301394815.2193.2.camel-H/AUWmsJYVeqvyCYKW+Xr6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yann Droneaud , "Hefty, Sean" Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Yann Droneaud wrote: > So ignoring IBV_EVENT_COMM_EST async event seems the best option when > using RDMA CM to establish connection ? no! its a must for the rare case of repeated CM packet loss - Sean, do you agree to that assertion? should the man page be more clear about that? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html