From: Hal Rosenstock <hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] infiniband-diags: perfquery; Support PortCountersExtendedNoIETF
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:30:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDCF65C.6000309@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110524144206.edb3b5d4.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
On 5/24/2011 5:42 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> From: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:28:55 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] infiniband-diags: perfquery; Support PortCountersExtendedNoIETF
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> src/perfquery.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/perfquery.c b/src/perfquery.c
> index 165c419..d34958f 100644
> --- a/src/perfquery.c
> +++ b/src/perfquery.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void output_aggregate_perfcounters(ib_portid_t * portid,
> portid2str(portid), ALL_PORTS, ntohs(cap_mask), buf);
> }
>
> -static void aggregate_perfcounters_ext(void)
> +static void aggregate_perfcounters_ext(uint16_t cap_mask)
> {
> uint32_t val;
> uint64_t val64;
> @@ -244,14 +244,17 @@ static void aggregate_perfcounters_ext(void)
> aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portxmitpkts, val64);
> mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_PKTS_F, &val64);
> aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portrcvpkts, val64);
> - mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_UPKTS_F, &val64);
> - aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portunicastxmitpkts, val64);
> - mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_UPKTS_F, &val64);
> - aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portunicastrcvpkts, val64);
> - mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_MPKTS_F, &val64);
> - aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portmulticastxmitpkits, val64);
> - mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_MPKTS_F, &val64);
> - aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portmulticastrcvpkts, val64);
> +
> + if (cap_mask & IB_PM_EXT_WIDTH_NOIETF_SUP) {
> + mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_UPKTS_F, &val64);
> + aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portunicastxmitpkts, val64);
> + mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_UPKTS_F, &val64);
> + aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portunicastrcvpkts, val64);
> + mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_MPKTS_F, &val64);
> + aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portmulticastxmitpkits, val64);
> + mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_MPKTS_F, &val64);
> + aggregate_64bit(&perf_count_ext.portmulticastrcvpkts, val64);
> + }
Doesn't NoIETF mean these counters aren't supported ? How can you get
unicast/multicast transmit/receive counters ?
> }
>
> static void output_aggregate_perfcounters_ext(ib_portid_t * portid,
> @@ -260,6 +263,8 @@ static void output_aggregate_perfcounters_ext(ib_portid_t * portid,
> char buf[1024];
> uint32_t val = ALL_PORTS;
>
> + memset(buf, 0, 1024);
> +
> /* set port_select to 255 to emulate AllPortSelect */
> mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_PORT_SELECT_F, &val);
> mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_COUNTER_SELECT_F,
> @@ -271,14 +276,17 @@ static void output_aggregate_perfcounters_ext(ib_portid_t * portid,
> mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_PKTS_F,
> &perf_count_ext.portxmitpkts);
> mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_PKTS_F, &perf_count_ext.portrcvpkts);
> - mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_UPKTS_F,
> - &perf_count_ext.portunicastxmitpkts);
> - mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_UPKTS_F,
> - &perf_count_ext.portunicastrcvpkts);
> - mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_MPKTS_F,
> - &perf_count_ext.portmulticastxmitpkits);
> - mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_MPKTS_F,
> - &perf_count_ext.portmulticastrcvpkts);
> +
> + if (cap_mask & IB_PM_EXT_WIDTH_NOIETF_SUP) {
> + mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_UPKTS_F,
> + &perf_count_ext.portunicastxmitpkts);
> + mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_UPKTS_F,
> + &perf_count_ext.portunicastrcvpkts);
> + mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_XMT_MPKTS_F,
> + &perf_count_ext.portmulticastxmitpkits);
> + mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_EXT_RCV_MPKTS_F,
> + &perf_count_ext.portmulticastrcvpkts);
> + }
Same comment as above.
-- Hal
>
> mad_dump_perfcounters_ext(buf, sizeof buf, pc, sizeof pc);
>
> @@ -312,9 +320,13 @@ static void dump_perfcounters(int extended, int timeout, uint16_t cap_mask,
> (cap_mask & IB_PM_PC_XMIT_WAIT_SUP)?IB_PC_LAST_F:(IB_PC_RCV_PKTS_F+1));
>
> } else {
> - if (!(cap_mask & IB_PM_EXT_WIDTH_SUPPORTED)) /* 1.2 errata: bit 9 is extended counter support */
> + /* 1.2 errata: bit 9 is extended counter support
> + * bit 10 is extended counter NoIETF
> + */
> + if (!(cap_mask & IB_PM_EXT_WIDTH_SUPPORTED) &&
> + !(cap_mask & IB_PM_EXT_WIDTH_NOIETF_SUP))
> IBWARN
> - ("PerfMgt ClassPortInfo 0x%x extended counters not indicated\n",
> + ("PerfMgt ClassPortInfo 0x%x; No extended counter support indicated\n",
> ntohs(cap_mask));
>
> memset(pc, 0, sizeof(pc));
> @@ -322,7 +334,7 @@ static void dump_perfcounters(int extended, int timeout, uint16_t cap_mask,
> IB_GSI_PORT_COUNTERS_EXT, srcport))
> IBERROR("perfextquery");
> if (aggregate)
> - aggregate_perfcounters_ext();
> + aggregate_perfcounters_ext(cap_mask);
> else
> mad_dump_perfcounters_ext(buf, sizeof buf, pc,
> sizeof pc);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 21:42 [PATCH 2/2] infiniband-diags: perfquery; Support PortCountersExtendedNoIETF Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20110524144206.edb3b5d4.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-25 12:30 ` Hal Rosenstock [this message]
[not found] ` <4DDCF65C.6000309-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-25 15:40 ` Ira Weiny
2011-05-25 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] " Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20110525095037.c7a945e7.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-25 18:18 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <4DDD480C.7050607-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-25 20:41 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <20110525134155.91dc6614.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-25 21:46 ` Hal Rosenstock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDCF65C.6000309@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--to=hal-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox