From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libibverbs: Allow 3rd party extensions to verb routines Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:14:37 +0300 Message-ID: <4DFA1DDD.5020508@mellanox.com> References: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237302123C@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237302123C-P5GAC/sN6hmkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: "linux-rdma (linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hefty, Sean wrote: > In order to support OFED or vendor specific calls, define a > generic extension mechanism. This allows OFED, an RDMA vendor, > or another registered 3rd party (for example, the librdmacm) > to define RDMA extensions. I'm trying to understand the way the user/kernel way of adding verbs is implemented... I wasn't sure, if/which specific kernel patch out of this series is matching this one? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html