From: Hal Rosenstock <hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Alex Netes <alexne-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] opensm: Use forward extensible and safer way to compare mkey_lmc field in PortInfo attribute
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:37:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1E2C1D.2070505@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
Rather than memcmp'ing the entire field, compare the two fields ignoring the
reserved field (which may some day be used). This makes SMs coded this
way better handle such a future spec expansion.
This change also gets this code closer to supporting M_KeyProtectBits.
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
diff --git a/include/iba/ib_types.h b/include/iba/ib_types.h
index b713f33..7beb916 100644
--- a/include/iba/ib_types.h
+++ b/include/iba/ib_types.h
@@ -4543,7 +4543,7 @@ typedef struct _ib_port_info {
uint8_t link_width_active;
uint8_t state_info1; /* LinkSpeedSupported and PortState */
uint8_t state_info2; /* PortPhysState and LinkDownDefaultState */
- uint8_t mkey_lmc;
+ uint8_t mkey_lmc; /* M_KeyProtectBits and LMC */
uint8_t link_speed; /* LinkSpeedEnabled and LinkSpeedActive */
uint8_t mtu_smsl;
uint8_t vl_cap; /* VLCap and InitType */
diff --git a/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c b/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c
index 5d0247a..4d59761 100644
--- a/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c
+++ b/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c
@@ -907,10 +907,12 @@ static int lid_mgr_set_physp_pi(IN osm_lid_mgr_t * p_mgr,
sizeof(p_pi->link_width_enabled)))
send_set = TRUE;
- /* M_KeyProtectBits are always zero */
+ /* M_KeyProtectBits are currently always zero */
p_pi->mkey_lmc = p_mgr->p_subn->opt.lmc;
- if (memcmp(&p_pi->mkey_lmc, &p_old_pi->mkey_lmc,
- sizeof(p_pi->mkey_lmc)))
+ if (ib_port_info_get_lmc(p_pi) !=
+ ib_port_info_get_lmc(p_old_pi) ||
+ ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_pi) !=
+ ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_old_pi))
send_set = TRUE;
/* calc new op_vls and mtu */
@@ -989,10 +991,12 @@ static int lid_mgr_set_physp_pi(IN osm_lid_mgr_t * p_mgr,
/* Determine if enhanced switch port 0 and if so set LMC */
if (osm_switch_sp0_is_lmc_capable(p_node->sw, p_mgr->p_subn)) {
- /* M_KeyProtectBits are always zero */
+ /* M_KeyProtectBits are currently always zero */
p_pi->mkey_lmc = p_mgr->p_subn->opt.lmc;
- if (memcmp(&p_pi->mkey_lmc, &p_old_pi->mkey_lmc,
- sizeof(p_pi->mkey_lmc)))
+ if (ib_port_info_get_lmc(p_pi) !=
+ ib_port_info_get_lmc(p_old_pi) ||
+ ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_pi) !=
+ ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_old_pi))
send_set = TRUE;
}
}
diff --git a/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c b/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c
index e446e16..dd37eee 100644
--- a/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c
+++ b/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c
@@ -235,16 +235,14 @@ static int link_mgr_set_physp_pi(osm_sm_t * sm, IN osm_physp_t * p_physp,
sizeof(p_pi->m_key_lease_period)))
send_set = TRUE;
- if (esp0 == FALSE)
- p_pi->mkey_lmc = sm->p_subn->opt.lmc;
- else {
- if (sm->p_subn->opt.lmc_esp0)
- p_pi->mkey_lmc = sm->p_subn->opt.lmc;
- else
- p_pi->mkey_lmc = 0;
- }
- if (memcmp(&p_pi->mkey_lmc, &p_old_pi->mkey_lmc,
- sizeof(p_pi->mkey_lmc)))
+ /* M_KeyProtectBits are currently always zero */
+ p_pi->mkey_lmc = 0;
+ if (esp0 == FALSE || sm->p_subn->opt.lmc_esp0)
+ ib_port_info_set_lmc(p_pi, sm->p_subn->opt.lmc);
+ if (ib_port_info_get_lmc(p_old_pi) !=
+ ib_port_info_get_lmc(p_pi) ||
+ ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_old_pi) !=
+ ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_pi))
send_set = TRUE;
ib_port_info_set_timeout(p_pi,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-13 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-13 23:37 Hal Rosenstock [this message]
[not found] ` <4E1E2C1D.2070505-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-20 12:13 ` [PATCH] opensm: Use forward extensible and safer way to compare mkey_lmc field in PortInfo attribute Alex Netes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E1E2C1D.2070505@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--to=hal-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alexne-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox