From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma/core: Really export ib_open_qp() to user space Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:41:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9AA6B8.8090707@mellanox.com> References: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237316E6AF56@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237316E6B1B1@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237316E6B1B1-P5GAC/sN6hmkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: Roland Dreier , Bart Van Assche , Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Lameter , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Dotan Barak , jack Morgenstein List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 10/14/2011 10:22 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: > Just an update: the issues that I was seeing were caused by missing > patches in my libraries (one in libmlx4 and the other in the ofed > compatibility layer). The XRC patches in for-next are testing out fine > for me, though it would be good if someone from Mellanox could try > running some tests Hi Sean, I pulled for-next and made some basic IB tests with it, looks okay, specifically I used ipoib connected mode and ibv_srq_pingpoing (libibverbs' srq test) to make sure non XRC SRQs are working fine. So what else would you suggest for further testing, is that pulling the xrc branch of your ofa hosted librdmacm/libibverbs/libmlx4 trees and run librdmacm's rdma_{xclient,xserver} example? I was a bit confused since I see this example both in the master and the xrc brach. BTW the master branch misses a tag for v1.0.15... Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html