From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [Patch opensm] Allow for easily configuring multiple fabrics on one opensm server Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 07:52:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4F54B707.1070606@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <4F4DB11C.5080203@redhat.com> <20120229112229.136f25b7.weiny2@llnl.gov> <4F4E80B4.5010508@redhat.com> <20120301021501.GB961@bukharin.us.cray.com> <4F4F7A4B.4060007@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F4F7A4B.4060007-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Ledford Cc: Brian Ginsbach , Ira Weiny , Alex Netes , Hal Rosenstock , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we need > opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-) Why does a single OpenSM need to handle multiple subnets/fabrics ? What's the issue with running multiple OpenSMs with each handling it's own subnet/fabric ? -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html