From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH fixed] libibmad: Add MKey support to SMP requests via smp_mkey_get/set() Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:29:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4F5F3DB1.1090002@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1331064594.10889.8.camel@auk75.llnl.gov> <1331071949.17729.11.camel@auk75.llnl.gov> <4F59FECE.4030107@dev.mellanox.co.il> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823733B767E36@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823733B767E36-P5GAC/sN6hmkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: Jim Foraker , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 3/9/2012 12:09 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a >> single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least >> flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA >> allows each port to have it's own different mkey. > > Is something more needed than just calling smp_mkey_set() to change it when needed? I don't think so but the "tricky" part is the mkey itself. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html