From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Marciniszyn,
Mike" <mike.marciniszyn-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Problem running rping over Intel adapters
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:40:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506CB0E9.90201@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2096 bytes --]
We ran into this problem when testing rping over Intel/QLogic hardware:
[root@rdmaperf3 ~]# rping -s -a 172.31.2.103 -v
wait for CONNECTED state 10
connect error -1
cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 28
[root@rdmaperf3 ~]#
[root@rdmaperf8 ~]# rping -c -a 172.31.2.103 -v -C 5
cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_ERROR, error -1
wait for CONNECTED state 4
connect error -1
[root@rdmaperf8 ~]#
Turns out this is because of a couple things:
1) rping, on the client side, clears the conn_params for the newly to be
attempted connection, then sets:
conn_param.responder_resources = 1;
conn_param.initiator_depth = 1;
conn_param.retry_count = 10;
On the accept side, rping clears the conn_params and then sets just the
responder_resources and initiator_depth, without even checking the
incoming requested conn_param values from the incoming cm_id. So, OK,
you can get away with that since this is a simple test program, but
still not "best programming practices". However, the important part
here is the retry_count of 10. That won't work on Intel/QLogic hardware.
2) the qib driver enforces a maximum of 7 for retry_count. I don't see
anything in the spec that specifies a maximum for this entry, and in
particular I know it doesn't call out for 7 to mean infinite retries
like it does for rnr_retry_count.
I don't think the spec really cares how we solve this, and I don't think
there is a hard limit of 7 for the retry_count like the qib driver
enforces. On the other hand, the spec doesn't call out a limit on the
retry_count but I would assume each driver has the option to implement
their own "reasonable, implementation defined" limit in a case like this.
So, do we make qib more liberal in its acceptance of retry_count or do
we fix rping to use a smaller number? Matters not to me...
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 895 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 21:40 Doug Ledford [this message]
[not found] ` <506CB0E9.90201-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-03 21:50 ` Problem running rping over Intel adapters Hefty, Sean
[not found] ` <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237346A98E58-Q3cL8pyY+6ukrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-03 21:57 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] ` <506CB4D8.4010604-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-03 22:02 ` Hefty, Sean
[not found] ` <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237346A98E8E-Q3cL8pyY+6ukrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-03 22:05 ` Doug Ledford
2012-10-04 1:47 ` Steve Wise
[not found] ` <506CEAC1.9070808-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-04 5:41 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <506D2174.10601-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-04 14:27 ` Steve Wise
[not found] ` <506D9CD2.20606-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-04 15:01 ` Hefty, Sean
[not found] ` <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237346A99126-Q3cL8pyY+6ukrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-04 15:08 ` Steve Wise
2012-10-03 22:38 ` Hefty, Sean
[not found] ` <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237346A98ECB-Q3cL8pyY+6ukrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-04 13:55 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506CB0E9.90201@redhat.com \
--to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox