From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Riemer Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Reducing the SRP initiator failover time Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:38:46 +0100 Message-ID: <5114E3C6.9010900@profitbricks.com> References: <510BC68A.90708@acm.org> <51142DE9.30900@mellanox.com> <5114C453.7010904@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5114C453.7010904@mellanox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Bart Van Assche , Vu Pham , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , David Dillow , Oren Duer List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 08.02.2013 10:24, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > On 2/8/2013 12:42 AM, Vu Pham wrote: >> Hello Bart, >> >> Thank you for taking the initiative. >> Mellanox think that this should be discussed. We'd be happy to attend. >> >> We also would like to discuss: >> * How and how fast does SRP detect a path failure besides RC error? >> * Role of srp_daemon, how often srp_daemon scan fabric for new/old >> targets, how-to scale srp_daemon discovery, traps. >> >> -vu > Hey Bart, > > I agree with Vu that this issue should be discussed. We'd be happy to > attend. > > -- > Sagi Wow, also thanks to Mellanox for spending resources on SRP as well! Last year in June we came across a very different situation. Cheers, Sebastian and the ProfitBricks storage team