From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH] libibumad/umad.c: In resolve_ca_port, skip ethernet link layer ports Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:59:09 -0500 Message-ID: <51267C8D.7030002@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <51266F1F.608@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20130221114427.0b82d4054d46a0920dda104e@llnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130221114427.0b82d4054d46a0920dda104e-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ira Weiny Cc: "linux-rdma (linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)" , Ilya Nelkenbaum List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 2/21/2013 2:44 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > What about QP1? It was my understanding that CM was still required for RoCE. Yes, RoCE requires CM support but AFAIK CM doesn't use/require these interfaces to get send or receive it's MADs. RoCE is a weird animal in terms of IB management as SM/QP0 is not used/deprecated and QP1 is only required for CM with most other QP1 things beyond the spec with the exception of SA which is also not used/deprecated. -- Hal > > Ira > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html