From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH] libibumad: add string functions for various enums Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:24:55 -0500 Message-ID: <5127C607.2030001@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <20130222091333.57b91bbb5957928eeb0e62a7@llnl.gov> <5127B87E.5020907@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20130222112315.9469e2a6003a98d26d2f1ec5@llnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130222112315.9469e2a6003a98d26d2f1ec5-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ira Weiny Cc: Hal Rosenstock , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 2/22/2013 2:23 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > But then shouldn't that enum value then be defined as UMAD_METHOD_RESP_MASK? Yes, that would be better. -- Hal > Ira -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html