From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shlomo Pongratz Subject: RE: [PATCH libibverbs v5 4/7] libibverbs: Add support for XRC QPs Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 11:39:30 +0300 Message-ID: <5157F642.9090004@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: 1364332466-22786-5-git-send-email-sean.hefty () intel ! com Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Or Gerlitz List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hi Sean, Just wonder, the Infiniband Annex for XRC uses the terms "XRC INI QP" and "XRC TGT QP" and the kernel include file "include/rdma/ib_verbs.h" also defines "IB_QPT_XRC_INI" and "IB_QPT_XRC_TGT" so why to use in "include/infiniband/verbs.h" other names i.e. "IBV_QPT_XRC_SEND" and "IBV_QPT_XRC_RECV"? I agree that send and receive are more intuitive but I think that consistency is more important. Best regards, S.P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html