From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: MLX4 Cq Question Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:55 +0300 Message-ID: <519B4FEB.5090701@mellanox.com> References: <51968438.7070907@opengridcomputing.com> <201305201753.10806.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il> <519B4104.4090102@mellanox.com> <519B4F81.9040108@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <519B4F81.9040108-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jack Morgenstein Cc: Bart Van Assche , Eli Cohen , Roland Dreier , Tom Tucker , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 21/05/2013 13:42, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/21/13 11:40, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> 2. is possible in the Linux kernel for one hard irq callback to flash on >> CPU X while another hard irq callback is running on the same CPU? > > I think that from kernel 2.6.35 on MSI IRQs are no longer nested. See > also > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=753649dbc49345a73a2454c770a3f2d54d11aec6 > or http://lwn.net/Articles/380931/ thanks, so suppose we agree on that, still the patch makes sense as the race is there, but does the patch has to change? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html