From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH] Segfault in osm_mgrp_delete_port() Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:39:10 -0400 Message-ID: <51A7567E.8040901@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <051b06cb-edf4-4b84-9030-1a1108d5fe25@default> <51A745B1.2000406@dev.mellanox.co.il> <51A75224.3020004@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51A75224.3020004-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Line Holen Cc: hal-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 5/30/2013 9:20 AM, Line Holen wrote: > On 05/30/13 14:27, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> Should we fix this "globally" in OpenSM to make it easier for tools >> which complain about unused return values ? > Regardless of tools complaining about this I find it useful to see that > you ignore > function return values deliberately. It's not a big deal to me, but I'm > in favor of > such a change. I'm not sure I can volunteer to do it on a global basis > though - > at least not right now.... I put this on a TODO list but as low priority. -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html