From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Wise Subject: Re: [PATCH libibverbs v5 3/7] livibverbs: Add support for XRC SRQs Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:13:55 -0500 Message-ID: <51ADF623.9080008@opengridcomputing.com> References: <1364332466-22786-1-git-send-email-sean.hefty@intel.com> <1364332466-22786-4-git-send-email-sean.hefty@intel.com> <51AD0528.6000900@opengridcomputing.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823736FD2CB36@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823736FD2CB36-P5GAC/sN6hkd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 6/3/2013 6:30 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >>> enum verbs_context_mask { >>> VERBS_CONTEXT_XRCD = 1 << 0, >>> - VERBS_CONTEXT_RESERVED = 1 << 1 >>> + VERBS_CONTEXT_SRQ = 1 << 1, >>> + VERBS_CONTEXT_RESERVED = 1 << 2 >>> }; >> Would VERBS_CONTEXT_XSRQ or VERBS_CONTEXT_SRQ_EX be more clear? > The structure being extended is ibv_srq, so I think just 'SRQ' is clearer. The same holds for VERBS_CONTEXT_QP. > > - Sean k. Will you be posting a new series soon for libibverbs and libmlx4 against the new releases? The old series' do not apply... thanks, Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html