From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: config file lost Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:19:43 -0400 Message-ID: <51C0424F.60307@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <51BDB769.70107@mellanox.com> <51BF591B.4090002@dev.mellanox.co.il> <51C02269.5050105@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51C02269.5050105-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Hal Rosenstock , "linux-rdma (linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)" , Yan Burman List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 6/18/2013 5:03 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 17/06/2013 21:44, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> I'm not 100% sure about the origin of those RPMs but I think the 3.3.15 >> one is RedHat packaged and the 3.3.16 appears to be PLD packaged and the >> processes are a little different. I suspect the 3.3.16 one is packaged >> with the spec file in the tree whereas RedHat uses their own spec file. >> >> FWIW it's simple to generate an up to date config file: >> >> opensm -c opensm.conf > > Hal, > > YES for your observations, that 3.3.15 was RHEL packages and the 3.3.16 > was built from the upstream spec. I know that > I can generate the config file using the method you suggested, however, > does the upstream service scripts uses the location to which this is > generated, Is /etc/rdma a standard location in Linux ? Is it used by other RDMA upstream components ? Also, opensm doesn't by default use this location for the config file. I expect that's dealt with by other scripts RedHat supplies. > so things are plug-and-play, or I need to hack that somehow? You would currently need to hack that. -- Hal > Or. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html