From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] IB/srp: Make HCA completion vector configurable Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:58:39 -0600 Message-ID: <51E5275F.2070009@acm.org> References: <51D41C03.4020607@acm.org> <51D41FFC.6070105@acm.org> <51E272A4.5030707@mellanox.com> <51E3D79D.9070808@acm.org> <51E3F931.9080903@mellanox.com> <51E43E22.2060502@acm.org> <51E51C56.50906@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51E51C56.50906-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Roland Dreier , David Dillow , Vu Pham , Sebastian Riemer , Jinpu Wang , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 16/07/2013 4:11, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > This sounds like a nice Idea, but there an inherent problem about > applications coming and going while the connections are static (somewhat), > how can you control pinning an arbitrary application running (over SRP > devices of-course) at certain point of time. > > So will you agree at least to give target->comp_vector a default of > IB_CQ_VECTOR_LEAST_ATTACHED? > From my point of view, a user that don't have a slightest clue about > completion vectors and performance optimization, this is somewhat better > than doing nothing... Hello Sagi, That sounds like an interesting proposal to me. But did the patch that adds the IB_CQ_VECTOR_LEAST_ATTACHED feature ever get accepted in the upstream Linux kernel ? I have tried to find that symbol in Linux kernel v3.11-rc1 but couldn't find it. Maybe I have overlooked something ? Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html