From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] mlx4: Avoid that mlx4_cmd_wait() contributes to the system load
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:48:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F0055F.7000703@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EFF018.7050409-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 07/24/13 17:17, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 22/07/2013 18:23, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Avoid that kernel threads running mlx4_cmd_wait() contribute to the
>> system load by setting the task state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE instead
>> of TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE while waiting. This patch reduces the load
>> average from about 0.5 to about 0.0 on an idle system with one mlx4
>> HCA and no IB cables connected.
>
> Before diving to the implications of the patch, lets discuss the
> phenomena you see...
> So the load average on this idle system is 0.5 or 0.05?
>
> I don't see 0.5 or a like on my systems that are installed with HCAs and
> are idle. Could it
> be that some IB management entity is repeatedly sending MADs to this
> system?
Hello Or,
I saw a load of 0.5 with several different upstream kernels (3.6..3.10
at least). The only IB-related process that was running on the system
was opensmd. This is definitely reproducible. It was only a month after
I had noticed this phenomenon that I started searching for the root cause.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-24 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 15:23 [PATCH, RFC] mlx4: Avoid that mlx4_cmd_wait() contributes to the system load Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <51ED4E60.30203-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-24 15:17 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <51EFF018.7050409-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-24 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
[not found] ` <51F0055F.7000703-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-24 17:06 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <51F0097C.4010806-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-24 17:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-07-24 18:34 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F0055F.7000703@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche-hinycgiudog@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox