From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Hal Rosenstock
<hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma
(linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Vladimir Koushnir
<vladimirk-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Jim Mott <jim-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 opensm] Add support for synchronizing in memory files with storage
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:57:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B59E5D.4000207@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B58F98.7040804-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
On 12/21/13 13:54, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> -int osm_db_store(IN osm_db_domain_t * p_domain)
> +int osm_db_store(IN osm_db_domain_t * p_domain,
> + IN boolean_t fsync_high_avail_files)
Version two of this patch looks fine to me, but while reviewing this
patch I noticed two issues in osm_db_store() that might need to be
addressed:
* With p_domain_imp->dirty == FALSE cl_spinlock_release() is called
without having invoked cl_spinlock_acquire() first. Can the 'dirty' flag
be modified concurrently with the test of the 'dirty' flag ? If so, the
test of this flag probably has to occur after the spinlock has been
acquired.
* If the malloc() call for allocating the temporary file name fails then
strcpy() will be called with NULL as first argument. Shouldn't the
return value of malloc() be checked ?
Thanks,
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-21 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-21 12:54 [PATCH v2 opensm] Add support for synchronizing in memory files with storage Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <52B58F98.7040804-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-21 13:57 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
[not found] ` <52B59E5D.4000207-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-21 16:33 ` Hal Rosenstock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B59E5D.4000207@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche-hinycgiudog@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jim-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vladimirk-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox