Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans

Nicholas A. Bellinger
2014-01-13T20:32:51Z

Hi Roland & Co,

Just curious if your planning to take a look at this series soon for
v3.14 code..?

As you might imagine, I'd like to see it merged this round in order to
move forward on iser-target protection for v3.15.

Are there any specific issues that you'd like to see addressed for an
initial merge..?

Thank you,

--nab

On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:37 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 08/01/2014 02:51, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > The data integrity stuff I'm not so sure about. Sean raised some I
> think legitimate questions about whether all this should be added to
> the verbs API and I want to see more discussion or at least have a
> deep think about this myself before comitting.
>
> Well, re the deep think thing, we have problem here -- the patches were
> posted three months ago, on Oct 15th 2013, and so far not a single bit
> of input from you. Can you take a look on that as soon as possible and
> let us know your thoughts?
>
> As for the questions posed by Sean -- Sagi, Tzahi and myself provided
> detailed answers. Taking into account the small scale of the rdma
> community, I don't see any other choice other than the guy wearing the
> maintainer hat to step in and provide his say or follow up questions
> that would cut things out or revive the discussion.
>
> Or.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html