public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>, Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 08/12] RDMA/rtrs: Kill recon_cnt from several structs
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:33:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52fec35a-e7d1-09d7-728f-60c2f86bd498@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMGffEmEGVJFGY6NEg+NvPG_h5A4J7oKtDhEw13=Kdn+13Fdrg@mail.gmail.com>



On 11/15/22 5:58 PM, Jinpu Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:53 AM Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:39 AM Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 2:08 AM Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>>> Seems the only relevant comment about recon_cnt is,
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>>   * On every new session connections increase reconnect counter
>>>>   * to avoid clashes with previous sessions not yet closed
>>>>   * sessions on a server side.
>>>>   */
>>>>
>>>> However, it is not clear how the recon_cnt avoid clashed at these places
>>>> in the commit since no where checks it.
>>> It does seem redundant. This predates my time, so I don't know if
>>> there was a change which removed the usage of this. I tried to search
>>> in commit history, but couldn't.
>>>
>>> @Jinpu Your thoughts?
> Sorry for sending an empty reply.
> I checked a bit, and also can find a reason why the recon_cnt was
> added, it is not checked on the server side.
> I think it's ok to remove it. But we can simply remove the field in
> rtrs_msg_conn_req, commented below.
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 8 --------
>>>>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-pri.h | 3 ---
>>>>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c | 7 +------
>>>>   3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
>>>> index 5ffc170dae8c..dcc8c041a141 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
>>>> @@ -1802,7 +1802,6 @@ static int rtrs_rdma_route_resolved(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
>>>>                  .version = cpu_to_le16(RTRS_PROTO_VER),
>>>>                  .cid = cpu_to_le16(con->c.cid),
>>>>                  .cid_num = cpu_to_le16(clt_path->s.con_num),
>>>> -               .recon_cnt = cpu_to_le16(clt_path->s.recon_cnt),
>>>>          };
>>>>          msg.first_conn = clt_path->for_new_clt ? FIRST_CONN : 0;
>>>>          uuid_copy(&msg.sess_uuid, &clt_path->s.uuid);
>>>> @@ -2336,13 +2335,6 @@ static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
>>>>          unsigned int cid;
>>>>          int err;
>>>>
>>>> -       /*
>>>> -        * On every new session connections increase reconnect counter
>>>> -        * to avoid clashes with previous sessions not yet closed
>>>> -        * sessions on a server side.
>>>> -        */
>>>> -       clt_path->s.recon_cnt++;
>>>> -
>>>>          /* Establish all RDMA connections  */
>>>>          for (cid = 0; cid < clt_path->s.con_num; cid++) {
>>>>                  err = create_con(clt_path, cid);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-pri.h b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-pri.h
>>>> index a2420eecaf5a..c4ddaeba1c59 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-pri.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-pri.h
>>>> @@ -109,7 +109,6 @@ struct rtrs_path {
>>>>          struct rtrs_con **con;
>>>>          unsigned int            con_num;
>>>>          unsigned int            irq_con_num;
>>>> -       unsigned int            recon_cnt;
>>>>          unsigned int            signal_interval;
>>>>          struct rtrs_ib_dev      *dev;
>>>>          int                     dev_ref;
>>>> @@ -177,7 +176,6 @@ struct rtrs_sg_desc {
>>>>    * @version:      RTRS protocol version
>>>>    * @cid:          Current connection id
>>>>    * @cid_num:      Number of connections per session
>>>> - * @recon_cnt:    Reconnections counter
>>>>    * @sess_uuid:    UUID of a session (path)
>>>>    * @paths_uuid:           UUID of a group of sessions (paths)
>>>>    *
>>>> @@ -196,7 +194,6 @@ struct rtrs_msg_conn_req {
>>>>          __le16          version;
>>>>          __le16          cid;
>>>>          __le16          cid_num;
>>>> -       __le16          recon_cnt;
>>>>          uuid_t          sess_uuid;
>>>>          uuid_t          paths_uuid;
>>>>          u8              first_conn : 1;
> We can remove it from protocol, this break compatibility with older kernel.

Can we bump up RTRS_PROTO_VER_MINOR for the compatibility? Otherwise
those structs are immutable forever.

Thanks,
Guoqing

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-13  1:08 [PATCH RFC 00/12] Misc changes for rtrs Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Remove ib_dev_count from rtrs_srv_ib_ctx Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14  7:39   ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-14  8:00     ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14  8:24       ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-14  8:45         ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 13:36           ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-15 10:22             ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Refactor rtrs_srv_rdma_cm_handler Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 14:39   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-15 10:24     ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Only close srv_path if it is just allocated Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 16:18   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-15 10:24     ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15 10:31       ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: refactor the handling of failure case in map_cont_bufs Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 16:21   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Correct the checking of ib_map_mr_sg Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15 11:46   ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-16  1:13     ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-16  5:44       ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] RDMA/rtrs-clt: " Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15 11:49   ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Remove outdated comments from create_con Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 16:22   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] RDMA/rtrs: Kill recon_cnt from several structs Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15  9:39   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-15  9:53     ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-15  9:58       ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-15 10:33         ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] RDMA/rtrs: Clean up rtrs_rdma_dev_pd_ops Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15  9:18   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Remove paths_num Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-15  9:48   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-15 10:01     ` Jinpu Wang
2022-11-15 10:30       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: fix several issues in rtrs_srv_destroy_path_files Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 16:22   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-13  1:08 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] RDMA/rtrs-srv: Remove kobject_del from rtrs_srv_destroy_once_sysfs_root_folders Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-14 16:23   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-11-14  8:32 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] Misc changes for rtrs Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-14  8:46   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-11-17  9:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-17 10:06   ` Guoqing Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52fec35a-e7d1-09d7-728f-60c2f86bd498@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=haris.iqbal@ionos.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox