From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IB/umad: Remove container_of() != NULL tests Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: <5370A41F.8050001@acm.org> References: <53708666.6060209@acm.org> <5370869F.5040103@acm.org> <1399889097.3017.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1399889097.3017.1.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yann Droneaud Cc: Roland Dreier , Alex Chiang , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 05/12/14 12:04, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Le lundi 12 mai 2014 =C3=A0 10:30 +0200, Bart Van Assche a =C3=A9crit= : >> container_of() never returns NULL. Hence remove the code that tests >> whether container_of() returns NULL. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche >> Cc: Alex Chiang >> Cc: > The patch seems fine. > > But I don't think this one qualify for linux-stable. One chunk in patch 3/3 touches code that is also touched by this patch. This means that if only patches 2/3 and 3/3 would be sent to stable tha= t these wouldn't apply properly. Hence the "Cc: stable" tag in this patch= =2E Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html