From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:23:07 +0200 Message-ID: <53901ADB.9020405@acm.org> References: <20140602171433.31076.5634.stgit@build.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140602171433.31076.5634.stgit-T4OLL4TyM9aNDNWfRnPdfg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Steve Wise , bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 06/02/14 19:14, Steve Wise wrote: > Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all subsequent send > work requests have been completed. Shouldn't that read "prior" instead of "subsequent" ? Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html