* nfs-rdma performance
@ 2014-06-12 19:54 Mark Lehrer
[not found] ` <CADvaNzXHOafuzav9RwB2SHXma7EUCxMQX6sNEL6r5-a_e37pLQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lehrer @ 2014-06-12 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Awesome work on nfs-rdma in the later kernels! I had been having
panic problems for awhile and now things appear to be quite reliable.
Now that things are more reliable, I would like to help work on speed
issues. On this same hardware with SMB Direct and the standard
storage review 8k 70/30 test, I get combined read & write performance
of around 2.5GB/sec. With nfs-rdma it is pushing about 850MB/sec.
This is simply an unacceptable difference.
I'm using the standard settings -- connected mode, 65520 byte MTU,
nfs-server-side "async", lots of nfsd's, and nfsver=3 with large
buffers. Does anyone have any tuning suggestions and/or places to
start looking for bottlenecks?
Thanks,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CADvaNzXHOafuzav9RwB2SHXma7EUCxMQX6sNEL6r5-a_e37pLQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: nfs-rdma performance [not found] ` <CADvaNzXHOafuzav9RwB2SHXma7EUCxMQX6sNEL6r5-a_e37pLQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-06-12 20:00 ` Steve Wise [not found] ` <539A06C3.1030909-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org> 2014-06-12 20:14 ` Wendy Cheng 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Steve Wise @ 2014-06-12 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Lehrer, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 6/12/2014 2:54 PM, Mark Lehrer wrote: > Awesome work on nfs-rdma in the later kernels! I had been having > panic problems for awhile and now things appear to be quite reliable. > > Now that things are more reliable, I would like to help work on speed > issues. On this same hardware with SMB Direct and the standard > storage review 8k 70/30 test, I get combined read & write performance > of around 2.5GB/sec. With nfs-rdma it is pushing about 850MB/sec. > This is simply an unacceptable difference. > > I'm using the standard settings -- connected mode, 65520 byte MTU, > nfs-server-side "async", lots of nfsd's, and nfsver=3 with large > buffers. Does anyone have any tuning suggestions and/or places to > start looking for bottlenecks? What RDMA device? Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <539A06C3.1030909-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: nfs-rdma performance [not found] ` <539A06C3.1030909-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-06-12 23:06 ` Mark Lehrer [not found] ` <CADvaNzUbqwvXFiDPNr4f-DC8s7kf7t=N0UXkwUXrKDPn6WgMAQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Lehrer @ 2014-06-12 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA I am using ConnectX-3 HCA's and Dell R720 servers. On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Steve Wise <swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On 6/12/2014 2:54 PM, Mark Lehrer wrote: >> >> Awesome work on nfs-rdma in the later kernels! I had been having >> panic problems for awhile and now things appear to be quite reliable. >> >> Now that things are more reliable, I would like to help work on speed >> issues. On this same hardware with SMB Direct and the standard >> storage review 8k 70/30 test, I get combined read & write performance >> of around 2.5GB/sec. With nfs-rdma it is pushing about 850MB/sec. >> This is simply an unacceptable difference. >> >> I'm using the standard settings -- connected mode, 65520 byte MTU, >> nfs-server-side "async", lots of nfsd's, and nfsver=3 with large >> buffers. Does anyone have any tuning suggestions and/or places to >> start looking for bottlenecks? > > > What RDMA device? > > Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CADvaNzUbqwvXFiDPNr4f-DC8s7kf7t=N0UXkwUXrKDPn6WgMAQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: nfs-rdma performance [not found] ` <CADvaNzUbqwvXFiDPNr4f-DC8s7kf7t=N0UXkwUXrKDPn6WgMAQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-06-13 7:25 ` Shirley Ma 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Shirley Ma @ 2014-06-13 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Lehrer, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 06/12/2014 04:06 PM, Mark Lehrer wrote: > I am using ConnectX-3 HCA's and Dell R720 servers. > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Steve Wise <swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> On 6/12/2014 2:54 PM, Mark Lehrer wrote: >>> >>> Awesome work on nfs-rdma in the later kernels! I had been having >>> panic problems for awhile and now things appear to be quite reliable. >>> >>> Now that things are more reliable, I would like to help work on speed >>> issues. On this same hardware with SMB Direct and the standard >>> storage review 8k 70/30 test, I get combined read & write performance >>> of around 2.5GB/sec. With nfs-rdma it is pushing about 850MB/sec. >>> This is simply an unacceptable difference. I was able to get close to 2.5GB/s with ConnectX-2 for direct I/O. What's your test case and wsize/rsize? Did you collect /proc/interrupts, cpu usage and profiling data? >>> >>> I'm using the standard settings -- connected mode, 65520 byte MTU, >>> nfs-server-side "async", lots of nfsd's, and nfsver=3 with large >>> buffers. Does anyone have any tuning suggestions and/or places to >>> start looking for bottlenecks? >> >> >> What RDMA device? >> >> Steve. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: nfs-rdma performance [not found] ` <CADvaNzXHOafuzav9RwB2SHXma7EUCxMQX6sNEL6r5-a_e37pLQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2014-06-12 20:00 ` Steve Wise @ 2014-06-12 20:14 ` Wendy Cheng 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Wendy Cheng @ 2014-06-12 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Lehrer; +Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Mark Lehrer <lehrer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Awesome work on nfs-rdma in the later kernels! I had been having > panic problems for awhile and now things appear to be quite reliable. > > Now that things are more reliable, I would like to help work on speed > issues. On this same hardware with SMB Direct and the standard > storage review 8k 70/30 test, I get combined read & write performance > of around 2.5GB/sec. With nfs-rdma it is pushing about 850MB/sec. > This is simply an unacceptable difference. > > I'm using the standard settings -- connected mode, 65520 byte MTU, > nfs-server-side "async", lots of nfsd's, and nfsver=3 with large > buffers. Does anyone have any tuning suggestions and/or places to > start looking for bottlenecks? > There is a tunable called "xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries" .. Increasing that seemed to help a lot for me last year. Be aware that this tunable is enclosed inside "#ifdef RPC_DEBUG" so you might need to tweak the source and rebuild the kmod. -- Wendy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-13 7:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-12 19:54 nfs-rdma performance Mark Lehrer
[not found] ` <CADvaNzXHOafuzav9RwB2SHXma7EUCxMQX6sNEL6r5-a_e37pLQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-12 20:00 ` Steve Wise
[not found] ` <539A06C3.1030909-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-12 23:06 ` Mark Lehrer
[not found] ` <CADvaNzUbqwvXFiDPNr4f-DC8s7kf7t=N0UXkwUXrKDPn6WgMAQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-13 7:25 ` Shirley Ma
2014-06-12 20:14 ` Wendy Cheng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox