From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
nab@linux-iscsi.org, roland@kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi_cmnd: Introduce scsi_transfer_length helper
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:48:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AA8CF7.8050102@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53AA42E6.3090101@cs.wisc.edu>
On 6/25/2014 6:32 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 12:08 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 06/24/2014 12:00 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> On 06/24/2014 11:30 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:27:46PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>>> This condition only matters in the bidi case, which is not
>>>>> relevant for the PI case. I suggested to condition that in
>>>>> libiscsi (posted in the second thread, copy-paste below).
>>>>> Although I do agree that scsi_transfer_length() helper is not
>>>>> really just for PI and not more. I think Mike's way is
>>>>> cleaner.
>>>> But for bidi there are two transfers. So either
>>>> scsi_transfer_length() needs to take the scsi_data_buffer, or we
>>>> need to avoid using it.
>>>>
>>>> For 3.16 I'd prefer something like you're patch below. This
>>>> patch which has been rushed in last minute and not through the
>>>> scsi tree has already causes enough harm. If you can come up
>>>> with a clean version to transparently handle the bidi case I'd be
>>>> happy to pick that up for 3.17.
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime please provide a version of the patch below with
>>>> a proper description and signoff.
>>>>
>>> It would be nice to just have one function to call and it just do
>>> the right thing for the drivers. I am fine with Sagi's libiscsi
>>> patch for now though:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>> Actually, let me take this back for a second. I am not sure if that
>> is right.
Hey Mike,
> Sagi's patch was not correct because scsi_in was hardcoded to the transfer
> len when bidi was used.
Right, should have condition that in the direction. something like:
transfer_length = sc->sc_data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
scsi_out(sc)->length : scsi_in(sc)->length;
would probably hit that in testing before sending out a patch.
> I made the patch below which should fix both bidi
> support in iscsi and also WRITE_SAME (and similar commands) support.
I'm a bit confused, for all commands (bidi or not) the iscsi header data_length
should describe the scsi_data_buffer length, bidi information will lie in AHS header.
(in case bidi will ever co-exist with PI, we might need another helper that will look
in req->special + PI, something like scsi_bidi_transfer_length)
So why not keep scsi_transfer_length to work on sdb length (take scsi_bufflen(scmnd) or
scsi_out(scmnd)->length as MKP suggested) and that's it - don't touch libiscsi.
Let me test that.
> There is one issue/question though. Is this working ok with LIO? I left
> scsi_transfer_length() with the same behavior as before assuming LIO was
> ok and only the iscsi initiator had suffered a regression.
I think that if we go with scsi_in/out_transfer_length then
scsi_transfer_length should be removed
and LIO can be modified to use scsi_in/out_transfer_length.
> ------------------
>
>
> [PATCH] iscsi/scsi: Fix transfer len calculation
I'll comment on the patch as well if we decide to go this way.
> This patch fixes the following regressions added in commit
> d77e65350f2d82dfa0557707d505711f5a43c8fd
>
> 1. The iscsi header data length is supposed to be the amount of
> data being transferred and not the total length of the operation
> like is given with blk_rq_bytes.
>
> 2. scsi_transfer_length is used in generic iscsi code paths, but
> did not take into account bidi commands.
>
> To fix both issues, this patch adds 2 new helpers that use the
> scsi_out/in(cmnd)->length values instead of blk_rq_bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> index 3d1bc67..ee79cdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(struct iscsi_task *task)
> struct iscsi_session *session = conn->session;
> struct scsi_cmnd *sc = task->sc;
> struct iscsi_scsi_req *hdr;
> - unsigned hdrlength, cmd_len, transfer_length;
> + unsigned hdrlength, cmd_len;
> itt_t itt;
> int rc;
>
> @@ -391,11 +391,11 @@ static int iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(struct iscsi_task *task)
> if (scsi_get_prot_op(sc) != SCSI_PROT_NORMAL)
> task->protected = true;
>
> - transfer_length = scsi_transfer_length(sc);
> - hdr->data_length = cpu_to_be32(transfer_length);
> if (sc->sc_data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> + unsigned out_len = scsi_out_transfer_length(sc);
> struct iscsi_r2t_info *r2t = &task->unsol_r2t;
>
> + hdr->data_length = cpu_to_be32(out_len);
> hdr->flags |= ISCSI_FLAG_CMD_WRITE;
> /*
> * Write counters:
> @@ -414,19 +414,18 @@ static int iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(struct iscsi_task *task)
> memset(r2t, 0, sizeof(*r2t));
>
> if (session->imm_data_en) {
> - if (transfer_length >= session->first_burst)
> + if (out_len >= session->first_burst)
> task->imm_count = min(session->first_burst,
> conn->max_xmit_dlength);
> else
> - task->imm_count = min(transfer_length,
> + task->imm_count = min(out_len,
> conn->max_xmit_dlength);
> hton24(hdr->dlength, task->imm_count);
> } else
> zero_data(hdr->dlength);
>
> if (!session->initial_r2t_en) {
> - r2t->data_length = min(session->first_burst,
> - transfer_length) -
> + r2t->data_length = min(session->first_burst, out_len) -
> task->imm_count;
> r2t->data_offset = task->imm_count;
> r2t->ttt = cpu_to_be32(ISCSI_RESERVED_TAG);
> @@ -439,6 +438,7 @@ static int iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(struct iscsi_task *task)
> } else {
> hdr->flags |= ISCSI_FLAG_CMD_FINAL;
> zero_data(hdr->dlength);
> + hdr->data_length = cpu_to_be32(scsi_in_transfer_length(sc));
In light of last comment from Vlad where bidi and PI may co-exist,
shouldn't
scsi_in_transfer_length(sc) be used also in iscsi_prep_bidi_ahs()? and
also in the print below?
>
> if (sc->sc_data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> hdr->flags |= ISCSI_FLAG_CMD_READ;
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(struct iscsi_task *task)
> scsi_bidi_cmnd(sc) ? "bidirectional" :
> sc->sc_data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
> "write" : "read", conn->id, sc, sc->cmnd[0],
> - task->itt, transfer_length,
> + task->itt, scsi_bufflen(sc),
In the DIF case length print would be wrong (doesn't include PI).
> scsi_bidi_cmnd(sc) ? scsi_in(sc)->length : 0,
> session->cmdsn,
> session->max_cmdsn - session->exp_cmdsn + 1);
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> index 42ed789..b04812d 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> @@ -316,9 +316,9 @@ static inline void set_driver_byte(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, char status)
> cmd->result = (cmd->result & 0x00ffffff) | (status << 24);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned scsi_transfer_length(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> +static inline unsigned __scsi_calculate_transfer_length(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd,
> + unsigned int xfer_len)
> {
> - unsigned int xfer_len = blk_rq_bytes(scmd->request);
> unsigned int prot_op = scsi_get_prot_op(scmd);
> unsigned int sector_size = scmd->device->sector_size;
>
> @@ -332,4 +332,20 @@ static inline unsigned scsi_transfer_length(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> return xfer_len + (xfer_len >> ilog2(sector_size)) * 8;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned scsi_transfer_length(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> +{
> + return __scsi_calculate_transfer_length(scmd,
> + blk_rq_bytes(scmd->request));
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned scsi_in_transfer_length(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> +{
> + return __scsi_calculate_transfer_length(scmd, scsi_in(scmd)->length);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned scsi_out_transfer_length(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> +{
> + return __scsi_calculate_transfer_length(scmd, scsi_out(scmd)->length);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _SCSI_SCSI_CMND_H */
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-11 9:09 [PATCH v2 0/3] Include protection information in transport header Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-11 9:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi_cmnd: Introduce scsi_transfer_length helper Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-11 23:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-23 21:24 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <53A89B0F.4040300-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-24 1:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-25 1:17 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2014-07-27 8:45 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <1402477799-24610-2-git-send-email-sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-24 6:54 ` Mike Christie
2014-06-24 12:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-24 14:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <yq1mwd2h3ju.fsf-+q57XtR/GgMb6DWv4sQWN6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-24 13:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-24 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-24 15:29 ` sagi grimberg
2014-06-24 16:08 ` Michael Christie
2014-06-24 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-24 16:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-24 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20140624163040.GA11499-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-24 17:00 ` Mike Christie
2014-06-24 17:04 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-24 17:08 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <53A9B0A0.6000103-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-25 3:32 ` Mike Christie
2014-06-25 8:48 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2014-06-25 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-25 10:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <53AAA547.40300-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-25 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20140625113536.GA30312-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-25 15:59 ` Michael Christie
2014-07-27 9:11 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <53D4C22F.8050904-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-27 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-06 12:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-25 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-25 11:29 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-24 16:31 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <yq1fviugtgq.fsf-+q57XtR/GgMb6DWv4sQWN6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-24 17:05 ` Mike Christie
2014-06-24 13:01 ` sagi grimberg
2014-06-26 14:53 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <53AC3402.2080302-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-26 14:55 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-26 15:41 ` Atchley, Scott
2014-06-26 16:38 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <fbbc6688-5a52-4437-93b1-71e8ff84c36c-2ueSQiBKiTY7tOexoI0I+QC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-26 21:17 ` Atchley, Scott
2014-07-13 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-13 11:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-11 9:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] libiscsi, iser: Adjust data_length to include protection information Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-23 20:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20140623205948.GA15165-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-24 6:31 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <1402477799-24610-3-git-send-email-sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-27 10:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <53D4CFAB.3040804-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-06 12:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-08-06 13:25 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-08-13 13:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <53EB639C.3080307-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-14 7:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <53E22300.3090907-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-06 15:54 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-11 9:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-11 21:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Include protection information in transport header Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53AA8CF7.8050102@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--to=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox