* assertion failed in osm_switch_get_lft_block() function
@ 2014-12-19 20:46 Vangelis Tasoulas
[not found] ` <54948EB7.1020706-S8y2klWGCOFhl2p70BpVqQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vangelis Tasoulas @ 2014-12-19 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux RDMA Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 692 bytes --]
Hello,
When I use LIDs from the top LFT block (0xbfc0-0xbfff), I get an
assertion error from the function osm_switch_get_lft_block() which is
implemented in osm_switch.c.
The line is this one:
CL_ASSERT(base_lid_ho + IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE <= IB_LID_UCAST_END_HO);
In the topmost LFT block, the base_lid_ho has the value 49088 and the
IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE is 64. Together they add up to 49152 but the assertion
checks if they are less than 0xbfff (49151).
Shouldn't this line be something like the following?
CL_ASSERT(base_lid_ho + IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE - 1 <= IB_LID_UCAST_END_HO);
or
CL_ASSERT(base_lid_ho + IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE <= IB_LID_UCAST_END_HO + 1);
Cheers,
Vangelis
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: assertion failed in osm_switch_get_lft_block() function
[not found] ` <54948EB7.1020706-S8y2klWGCOFhl2p70BpVqQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2014-12-20 13:08 ` Hal Rosenstock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hal Rosenstock @ 2014-12-20 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vangelis Tasoulas; +Cc: Linux RDMA Mailing List
On 12/19/2014 3:46 PM, Vangelis Tasoulas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I use LIDs from the top LFT block (0xbfc0-0xbfff), I get an
> assertion error from the function osm_switch_get_lft_block() which is
> implemented in osm_switch.c.
>
> The line is this one:
> CL_ASSERT(base_lid_ho + IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE <= IB_LID_UCAST_END_HO);
>
> In the topmost LFT block, the base_lid_ho has the value 49088 and the
> IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE is 64. Together they add up to 49152 but the assertion
> checks if they are less than 0xbfff (49151).
>
> Shouldn't this line be something like the following?
>
> CL_ASSERT(base_lid_ho + IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE - 1 <= IB_LID_UCAST_END_HO);
>
> or
>
> CL_ASSERT(base_lid_ho + IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE <= IB_LID_UCAST_END_HO + 1);
Yes. Would you issue patch for this ?
Thanks.
-- Hal
> Cheers,
> Vangelis
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-20 13:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-19 20:46 assertion failed in osm_switch_get_lft_block() function Vangelis Tasoulas
[not found] ` <54948EB7.1020706-S8y2klWGCOFhl2p70BpVqQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-20 13:08 ` Hal Rosenstock
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox