From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/verbs: Check each operation of dma_ops individually
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:52:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552CD53B.3@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424667027-8790-1-git-send-email-yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 2/23/2015 6:50 AM, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> Current approach force one to implement all ops even when some functions can use the default implementation.
> As a result, for new DMA ops (e.x new arch) many functions just wrap the default function.
> The fix is to check each DMA operation individually so one can leave empty the ones not need to be override.
>
I guess this is OK, but aren't we better off with wrappers than
adding another condition statement?
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> index 0d74f1d..166c01a 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ struct ib_mr *ib_get_dma_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, int mr_access_flags);
> */
> static inline int ib_dma_mapping_error(struct ib_device *dev, u64 dma_addr)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->mapping_error)
> return dev->dma_ops->mapping_error(dev, dma_addr);
> return dma_mapping_error(dev->dma_device, dma_addr);
> }
> @@ -2161,7 +2161,7 @@ static inline u64 ib_dma_map_single(struct ib_device *dev,
> void *cpu_addr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->map_single)
> return dev->dma_ops->map_single(dev, cpu_addr, size, direction);
> return dma_map_single(dev->dma_device, cpu_addr, size, direction);
> }
> @@ -2177,7 +2177,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_unmap_single(struct ib_device *dev,
> u64 addr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->unmap_single)
> dev->dma_ops->unmap_single(dev, addr, size, direction);
> else
> dma_unmap_single(dev->dma_device, addr, size, direction);
> @@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ static inline u64 ib_dma_map_page(struct ib_device *dev,
> size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->map_page)
> return dev->dma_ops->map_page(dev, page, offset, size, direction);
> return dma_map_page(dev->dma_device, page, offset, size, direction);
> }
> @@ -2231,7 +2231,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_unmap_page(struct ib_device *dev,
> u64 addr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->unmap_page)
> dev->dma_ops->unmap_page(dev, addr, size, direction);
> else
> dma_unmap_page(dev->dma_device, addr, size, direction);
> @@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ static inline int ib_dma_map_sg(struct ib_device *dev,
> struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->map_sg)
> return dev->dma_ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, direction);
> return dma_map_sg(dev->dma_device, sg, nents, direction);
> }
> @@ -2264,7 +2264,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_unmap_sg(struct ib_device *dev,
> struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> enum dma_data_direction direction)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->unmap_sg)
> dev->dma_ops->unmap_sg(dev, sg, nents, direction);
> else
> dma_unmap_sg(dev->dma_device, sg, nents, direction);
> @@ -2325,7 +2325,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct ib_device *dev,
> size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->sync_single_for_cpu)
> dev->dma_ops->sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir);
> else
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev->dma_device, addr, size, dir);
> @@ -2343,7 +2343,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct ib_device *dev,
> size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->sync_single_for_device)
> dev->dma_ops->sync_single_for_device(dev, addr, size, dir);
> else
> dma_sync_single_for_device(dev->dma_device, addr, size, dir);
> @@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ static inline void *ib_dma_alloc_coherent(struct ib_device *dev,
> u64 *dma_handle,
> gfp_t flag)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->alloc_coherent)
> return dev->dma_ops->alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flag);
> else {
> dma_addr_t handle;
> @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ static inline void ib_dma_free_coherent(struct ib_device *dev,
> size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> u64 dma_handle)
> {
> - if (dev->dma_ops)
> + if (dev->dma_ops && dev->dma_ops->free_coherent)
> dev->dma_ops->free_coherent(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle);
> else
> dma_free_coherent(dev->dma_device, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-23 4:50 [PATCH] IB/verbs: Check each operation of dma_ops individually Yuval Shaia
[not found] ` <1424667027-8790-1-git-send-email-yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-14 8:45 ` Yuval Shaia
2015-04-14 8:52 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
[not found] ` <552CD53B.3-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-14 20:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552CD53B.3@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--to=sagig-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox