RE: [PATCH v4 0/4] Sending kernel pathrecord query to user cache server

Hefty, Sean
2015-06-10T21:34:58Z

> Not directly. IPoIB treats it that way. I guess to "be safe".
>
> Officially one should register for UnPath/RePath traps. But no one has
> ever implemented that.
>
> To be clear I am agreeing with Hal that having some sort of "update
> signal" would be nice. But I don't think that must be done before this
> series goes in.
>
> I think a PR "update signal" should be an extension to this interface.

I agree. I just wanted to make sure that there wasn't some feature regarding PRs, such as unpath, that a kernel client would lose (i.e. it is currently implemented) by changing how the PRs are retrieved. Basically nothing breaks with this change.