From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] RDMA/isert: Support iWARP transport Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 13:51:17 +0300 Message-ID: <5597BAA5.4070208@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <20150701162936.6501.45512.stgit@build.ogc.int> <20150701163058.6501.39171.stgit@build.ogc.int> <009a01d0b43f$f5fa8640$e1ef92c0$@opengridcomputing.com> <5594DA1E.7040604@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20150702163937.GB4642@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150702163937.GB4642-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Or Gerlitz , Steve Wise , Doug Ledford , Roi Dayan , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Sagi Grimberg , Mike Marciniszyn , target-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Eli Cohen , Or Gerlitz List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 7/2/2015 7:39 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:28:46AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> Or has a good point. >> The DMA mkey in target mode is discrete and not sent to any peer. > > That doesn't mean the peer cannot guess it. > > Using the right permission is clearly a stronger protection, we > shouldn't weaken IB just to accommodate iWarp's limitations. > Can't argue with that. Sorry Steve for the hassle... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html