* re: IB/mlx5: Support IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR
@ 2015-08-12 10:36 Dan Carpenter
2015-08-12 17:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2015-08-12 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w; +Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hello Sagi Grimberg,
The patch e6631814fb3a: "IB/mlx5: Support IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR" from Feb
23, 2014, leads to the following static checker warning:
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c:764 ipoib_cm_send()
warn: 'rc' can be either negative or positive
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c
2417 static int set_psv_wr(struct ib_sig_domain *domain,
2418 u32 psv_idx, void **seg, int *size)
2419 {
2420 struct mlx5_seg_set_psv *psv_seg = *seg;
2421
2422 memset(psv_seg, 0, sizeof(*psv_seg));
2423 psv_seg->psv_num = cpu_to_be32(psv_idx);
2424 switch (domain->sig_type) {
2425 case IB_SIG_TYPE_NONE:
2426 break;
2427 case IB_SIG_TYPE_T10_DIF:
2428 psv_seg->transient_sig = cpu_to_be32(domain->sig.dif.bg << 16 |
2429 domain->sig.dif.app_tag);
2430 psv_seg->ref_tag = cpu_to_be32(domain->sig.dif.ref_tag);
2431 break;
2432 default:
2433 pr_err("Bad signature type given.\n");
2434 return 1;
Probably we should return -EINVAL here? It actually really upsets the
static checker because all the callers expect negative error codes and
there are lot of callers.
2435 }
2436
2437 *seg += sizeof(*psv_seg);
2438 *size += sizeof(*psv_seg) / 16;
2439
2440 return 0;
2441 }
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: IB/mlx5: Support IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR
2015-08-12 10:36 IB/mlx5: Support IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR Dan Carpenter
@ 2015-08-12 17:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2015-08-12 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 8/12/2015 1:36 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Sagi Grimberg,
>
> The patch e6631814fb3a: "IB/mlx5: Support IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR" from Feb
> 23, 2014, leads to the following static checker warning:
>
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c:764 ipoib_cm_send()
> warn: 'rc' can be either negative or positive
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c
> 2417 static int set_psv_wr(struct ib_sig_domain *domain,
> 2418 u32 psv_idx, void **seg, int *size)
> 2419 {
> 2420 struct mlx5_seg_set_psv *psv_seg = *seg;
> 2421
> 2422 memset(psv_seg, 0, sizeof(*psv_seg));
> 2423 psv_seg->psv_num = cpu_to_be32(psv_idx);
> 2424 switch (domain->sig_type) {
> 2425 case IB_SIG_TYPE_NONE:
> 2426 break;
> 2427 case IB_SIG_TYPE_T10_DIF:
> 2428 psv_seg->transient_sig = cpu_to_be32(domain->sig.dif.bg << 16 |
> 2429 domain->sig.dif.app_tag);
> 2430 psv_seg->ref_tag = cpu_to_be32(domain->sig.dif.ref_tag);
> 2431 break;
> 2432 default:
> 2433 pr_err("Bad signature type given.\n");
> 2434 return 1;
>
> Probably we should return -EINVAL here? It actually really upsets the
> static checker because all the callers expect negative error codes and
> there are lot of callers.
I'll send out a fix for it.
Thanks Dan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-12 17:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-12 10:36 IB/mlx5: Support IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR Dan Carpenter
2015-08-12 17:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).