From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Bodong Wang <wbd2905-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org,
moshel-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
haggaie-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
matanb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IB/mlx4: Report checksum offload cap when query device
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:46:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FB7AE8.2070304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68bea4df2c89e5457aaaccf914756bc309d742a7.1442413048.git.bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1910 bytes --]
On 09/16/2015 11:56 AM, Bodong Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c
> index 8be6db8..a70ca6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ static int mlx4_ib_query_device(struct ib_device *ibdev,
> props->device_cap_flags |= IB_DEVICE_MANAGED_FLOW_STEERING;
> }
>
> + props->csum_cap.eth_csum_cap |= IB_CSUM_SUPPORT_RAW;
> + props->csum_cap.ib_csum_cap |= IB_CSUM_SUPPORT_UD;
> +
> props->vendor_id = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *) (out_mad->data + 36)) &
> 0xffffff;
> props->vendor_part_id = dev->dev->persist->pdev->device;
>
This patch highlights something I didn't think about on the previous
patch. Why separate eth/ib if you have per QP flags? The QP denotes
the ib/eth relationship without the need to separate it into two
different caps. In other words, you can never have an IB qp type on eth
because the only eth QP types we support other than RAW are all RDMA and
not IP. Really, there's enough spare bits in ib_device_cap_flags that
you could do away with the new caps entirely. Right now, we support UD
(which we already have a flag for), we can add two flags (for RAW and
RC) and that should cover all of the foreseeable options as that would
allow us to extend IP CSUM support to cover connected mode and cover all
of the current options. I don't see us doing IP traffic in any other
situation, so I thing that should suffice. Bits 25 and 26 could be used
for the two new bits. Then you just need to extend the bits to user space.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 884 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-18 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-16 15:56 [PATCH 0/3] Enable checksum offload capability reporting Bodong Wang
[not found] ` <cover.1442413048.git.bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-16 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] IB/core: Add support of checksum capability reporting in ib verbs Bodong Wang
[not found] ` <490a38ab04a96f24500d647392e931c38853ba45.1442413048.git.bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-16 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509161201100.22920-wcBtFHqTun5QOdAKl3ChDw@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-16 17:16 ` Bodong Wang
2015-09-18 2:39 ` Doug Ledford
2015-09-16 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] IB/uverbs: Add support for checksum capability reporting in user verbs Bodong Wang
2015-09-16 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] IB/mlx4: Report checksum offload cap when query device Bodong Wang
[not found] ` <68bea4df2c89e5457aaaccf914756bc309d742a7.1442413048.git.bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-18 2:46 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
[not found] ` <55FB7AE8.2070304-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-21 21:41 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <CAJ3xEMg31JSPU2_gW0OGjC9rdTgDRcx=7LnuPncD6+gCE7nRMw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-21 21:59 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] ` <56007DDF.30502-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-22 4:45 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FB7AE8.2070304@redhat.com \
--to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bodong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=haggaie-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matanb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=moshel-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wbd2905-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).