From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: libmlx4 and libmlx5 git trees? Who is handling those? Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:49:26 -0400 Message-ID: <5609A7D6.9030808@redhat.com> References: <56096033.8040000@redhat.com> <20150928171724.GF12415@obsidianresearch.com> <9C6B67F36DCAFC479B1CF6A967258A8C7D250932@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150928173208.GA8083@infradead.org> <20150928174215.GB1623@obsidianresearch.com> <9C6B67F36DCAFC479B1CF6A967258A8C7D25098A@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150928190024.GB8358@obsidianresearch.com> <5609A19A.806@redhat.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A904D40B@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <9C6B67F36DCAFC479B1CF6A967258A8C7D250AFC@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SkDGhNPjkNhtW8Ax2uSqWwiFrXIA805fw" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9C6B67F36DCAFC479B1CF6A967258A8C7D250AFC-8oqHQFITsIHTXloPLtfHfbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Woodruff, Robert J" , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Lameter , Or Gerlitz , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --SkDGhNPjkNhtW8Ax2uSqWwiFrXIA805fw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/28/2015 04:40 PM, Woodruff, Robert J wrote: > Sean wrote, >> The issue is that basically no one tests the releases of the packages.= =20 >=20 > We assume that the maintainer of the package tests it before they relea= se it :) Every package maintainer I know of does. But there isn't a single package maintainer that has a 100% test setup that covers all of the various ways in which their code is used. Maintainer testing should be considered good, but *never* sufficient for release testing. There needs to be more done. > The OFED testing then tests all the currently released packages This is backwards IMO. Testing after the release results in exactly what I mentioned in my email. The right time to test is during the release process, not after it is already complete. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --SkDGhNPjkNhtW8Ax2uSqWwiFrXIA805fw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWCafWAAoJELgmozMOVy/dITUQAKlseK5V/DFj/LB0iQ5zPmK9 Rbs9OeLEG6rnIV9S5LedwGfBGj2Bn4twZ2ssvPUZhSaJRaLbF82mgproiVsyfdY+ arvkNuCSQhuBG312WiHEGeX+ykUSxqv9BPIri7tingSUvZCrwntjDILy39rcUokT C+zG2avilEcGTCMF9/l5mUa4giJti8RGem0VX4tg9thDXFMQ/99fvA3uhjDfoPnX fzuQSwrbUNnj2o8lzEQttIRIIp+eiki4YWJv3tmUMVAIOPC7k4yAsCNFbZXM1aUh cym1u+P7ac9rkqW5U/lUGKidRHCbpsXPZF/1NOoAIgjG6TWtt4zyUnDoeKRz9/RU /gNhOSnTiWIsXjz/SeAjr2H7CqRhyVIps7Fg7vy2lSDMvaTkHVdAc+6uJ4geJnjL hcJwtJHVx5Sn1/Dm31RYt9QoWTYxPMjKILBoKTdRvy6tBQgwtP6nPtDLcEROCtM5 8zG2e70sGEgrp5yjnCXmE3bV9TK19z/CEXUnNjVb9+KMVpqxK8ca2ehhZlTW6P/y 1bX6fQxb3AwxNpF8D8WdYA276HV8DH5IZOZ1zkj2k+Zcd6L61zj/a98ReiVBZz2s uhJ5oFTvd4Ha3o6zuwDEmHyaAL5Ws9iY5Fxmw4YPGLmTiIKlBVyIcLIKj4l/E6kS wBUrulzY6LrOZU6G2CYA =Iqtr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SkDGhNPjkNhtW8Ax2uSqWwiFrXIA805fw-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html