From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:58:25 +0300 Message-ID: <560AFB71.3010003@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1442482947-27785-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <560AE099.2080004@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <560AE099.2080004-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bart Van Assche , Sagi Grimberg , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 9/29/2015 10:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 09/17/2015 02:42 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> - Converted SRP initiator and RDS iwarp ULPs to the new API > > Hello Sagi, > Hi Bart, > How has the converted SRP initiator driver been tested ? With the kernel > tree that is available on branch reg_api.4 That's odd. Although I haven't formally submitted reg_api.4 yet, I did test ib_srp initiator against upstream srpt over CX3 (mlx4) and CX4 (mlx5). I ran connect, disconnect, stress IO of all block sizes and some unaligned block-IO and SG_IO test utilities. It all seems to pass for me. Just this morning (my morning) I tested the v2 set on iser, srp, nfs. I placed that in branch reg_api.5. Would you mind running reg_api.5 and see if this issue persist (I would be surprised because I haven't seen any sign of it)? Thanks, Sagi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html