From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haggai Eran Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2] IB/qib: Change lkey table allocation to support more MRs Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:58:05 +0300 Message-ID: <561362ED.9000105@mellanox.com> References: <20150929145143.27497.86046.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <560B933D.7020605@mellanox.com> <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC257D8BB0@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC257D8BB0-RjuIdWtd+YbTXloPLtfHfbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Marciniszyn, Mike" , "stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 02/10/2015 16:10, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote: >>> The lkey table is allocated with with a get_user_pages() with an >> Don't you mean __get_free_pages? >> >=20 > I was a nit in the original upstream commit. >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t think it is a big deal since the patch context clarif= ies. I agree it's not a big deal. I guess it only caught my attention since reading it made me wonder why you need pinned user memory for the lkey table. Haggai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html