From: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: leon-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPoIB: serialize changing on tx_outstanding
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:55:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5615F743.5050404@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151008043317.GB1940-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
Hi Leon,
thanks for review.
在 2015年10月08日 12:33, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 01:42:10PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> The changing on tx_outstanding should be protected by spinlock or to be
>> atomic operations.
>>
>> Such log is found in dmesg:
>>
>> Sep 16 14:20:53 naep11x06 kernel: ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 1034733, tx_tail 1034733, tx_outstanding 359 ipoib_sendq_size: 512
>> Sep 16 14:21:33 naep11x06 kernel: ib0: transmit timeout: latency 9560 msecs
>> Sep 16 14:21:33 naep11x06 kernel: ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 1034854, tx_tail 1034854, tx_outstanding 511 ipoib_sendq_size: 512
>> Sep 16 14:21:38 naep11x06 kernel: ib0: transmit timeout: latency 14568 msecs
>> Sep 16 14:21:38 naep11x06 kernel: ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 1034854, tx_tail 1034854, tx_outstanding 511 ipoib_sendq_size: 512
>>
>> And the send queue of ib0 kept full. When transmit timeout is reported,
>> queue is reported as "stopped", but the IPoIB stuff tx_head and tx_tail
>> points to same value. I am not able to see such numbers in ipoib_cm_tx
>> (for CM) because I have no vmcore. Though I am not quite sure it's caused
>> by parallel access of tx_outstanding(send path VS interrup path), we really
>> need to serialize the changeing on tx_outstanding.
>>
>> This patch also make sure the increase of tx_outstanding prior to the
>> calling of post_send to avoid the possible decreasing before increasing in
>> case the running of increasing is scheduled later than the interrupt
>> handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
>> index c78dc16..044da94 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
>> @@ -710,6 +710,7 @@ void ipoib_cm_send(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ipoib_cm_
>> struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
>> int rc;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> if (unlikely(skb->len > tx->mtu)) {
>> ipoib_warn(priv, "packet len %d (> %d) too long to send, dropping\n",
>> @@ -742,27 +743,36 @@ void ipoib_cm_send(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ipoib_cm_
>> skb_orphan(skb);
>> skb_dst_drop(skb);
>>
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> + if (++priv->tx_outstanding == ipoib_sendq_size) {
>> + ipoib_dbg(priv, "TX ring 0x%x full, stopping kernel net queue\n",
>> + tx->qp->qp_num);
>> + netif_stop_queue(dev);
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>> + if (netif_queue_stopped(dev)) {
>> + rc = ib_req_notify_cq(priv->send_cq,
>> + IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP | IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + ipoib_warn(priv, "request notify on send CQ failed\n");
>> + else if (rc)
>> + ipoib_send_comp_handler(priv->send_cq, dev);
>> + }
>> +
>> rc = post_send(priv, tx, tx->tx_head & (ipoib_sendq_size - 1), tx_req);
>> if (unlikely(rc)) {
>> ipoib_warn(priv, "post_send failed, error %d\n", rc);
>> ++dev->stats.tx_errors;
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> + --priv->tx_outstanding;
>> + if (netif_queue_stopped(dev))
>> + netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> Why are you locking the netif_* calls?
Yes, I intended to do that. This make the accessing on tx_outstanding
and the reopening of the send queue in the same atomic session which is
the expected behavior.
Otherwise, we may have the following problem:
#time order
thread1(on cpu1) thread2(on cpu2)
lock
modify/check tx_outstanding
unlock
lock
modify/check tx_outstanding
unlock
reopen queue
stop queue
So that we actually want reopen the send queue, but the result is we
stopped it.
thanks,
wengang
>> ipoib_dma_unmap_tx(priv, tx_req);
>> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> } else {
>> dev->trans_start = jiffies;
>> ++tx->tx_head;
>> -
>> - if (++priv->tx_outstanding == ipoib_sendq_size) {
>> - ipoib_dbg(priv, "TX ring 0x%x full, stopping kernel net queue\n",
>> - tx->qp->qp_num);
>> - netif_stop_queue(dev);
>> - rc = ib_req_notify_cq(priv->send_cq,
>> - IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP | IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS);
>> - if (rc < 0)
>> - ipoib_warn(priv, "request notify on send CQ failed\n");
>> - else if (rc)
>> - ipoib_send_comp_handler(priv->send_cq, dev);
>> - }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -796,10 +806,13 @@ void ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc(struct net_device *dev, struct ib_wc *wc)
>> netif_tx_lock(dev);
>>
>> ++tx->tx_tail;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> if (unlikely(--priv->tx_outstanding == ipoib_sendq_size >> 1) &&
>> netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
>> test_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_ADMIN_UP, &priv->flags))
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>>
>> if (wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS &&
>> wc->status != IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR) {
>> @@ -1169,6 +1182,7 @@ static void ipoib_cm_tx_destroy(struct ipoib_cm_tx *p)
>> struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(p->dev);
>> struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
>> unsigned long begin;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> ipoib_dbg(priv, "Destroy active connection 0x%x head 0x%x tail 0x%x\n",
>> p->qp ? p->qp->qp_num : 0, p->tx_head, p->tx_tail);
>> @@ -1198,10 +1212,12 @@ timeout:
>> dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_req->skb);
>> ++p->tx_tail;
>> netif_tx_lock_bh(p->dev);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> if (unlikely(--priv->tx_outstanding == ipoib_sendq_size >> 1) &&
>> netif_queue_stopped(p->dev) &&
>> test_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_ADMIN_UP, &priv->flags))
>> netif_wake_queue(p->dev);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>> netif_tx_unlock_bh(p->dev);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
>> index d266667..7616e3c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
>> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static void ipoib_ib_handle_tx_wc(struct net_device *dev, struct ib_wc *wc)
>> struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> unsigned int wr_id = wc->wr_id;
>> struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> ipoib_dbg_data(priv, "send completion: id %d, status: %d\n",
>> wr_id, wc->status);
>> @@ -397,10 +398,13 @@ static void ipoib_ib_handle_tx_wc(struct net_device *dev, struct ib_wc *wc)
>> dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_req->skb);
>>
>> ++priv->tx_tail;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> if (unlikely(--priv->tx_outstanding == ipoib_sendq_size >> 1) &&
>> netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
>> test_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_ADMIN_UP, &priv->flags))
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>>
>> if (wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS &&
>> wc->status != IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR) {
>> @@ -540,6 +544,7 @@ void ipoib_send(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
>> int hlen, rc;
>> void *phead;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
>> hlen = skb_transport_offset(skb) + tcp_hdrlen(skb);
>> @@ -587,12 +592,22 @@ void ipoib_send(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> else
>> priv->tx_wr.send_flags &= ~IB_SEND_IP_CSUM;
>>
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> if (++priv->tx_outstanding == ipoib_sendq_size) {
>> ipoib_dbg(priv, "TX ring full, stopping kernel net queue\n");
>> if (ib_req_notify_cq(priv->send_cq, IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP))
>> ipoib_warn(priv, "request notify on send CQ failed\n");
>> netif_stop_queue(dev);
>> }
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>> + if (netif_queue_stopped(dev)) {
>> + rc = ib_req_notify_cq(priv->send_cq,
>> + IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP | IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + ipoib_warn(priv, "request notify on send CQ failed\n");
>> + else if (rc)
>> + ipoib_send_comp_handler(priv->send_cq, dev);
>> + }
>>
>> skb_orphan(skb);
>> skb_dst_drop(skb);
>> @@ -602,11 +617,13 @@ void ipoib_send(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> if (unlikely(rc)) {
>> ipoib_warn(priv, "post_send failed, error %d\n", rc);
>> ++dev->stats.tx_errors;
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> --priv->tx_outstanding;
>> - ipoib_dma_unmap_tx(priv, tx_req);
>> - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> if (netif_queue_stopped(dev))
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>> + ipoib_dma_unmap_tx(priv, tx_req);
>> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> } else {
>> dev->trans_start = jiffies;
>>
>> @@ -825,6 +842,7 @@ int ipoib_ib_dev_stop(struct net_device *dev)
>> unsigned long begin;
>> struct ipoib_tx_buf *tx_req;
>> int i;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> if (test_and_clear_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_INITIALIZED, &priv->flags))
>> napi_disable(&priv->napi);
>> @@ -857,7 +875,9 @@ int ipoib_ib_dev_stop(struct net_device *dev)
>> ipoib_dma_unmap_tx(priv, tx_req);
>> dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_req->skb);
>> ++priv->tx_tail;
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> --priv->tx_outstanding;
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ipoib_recvq_size; ++i) {
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 5:42 [PATCH] IPoIB: serialize changing on tx_outstanding Wengang Wang
[not found] ` <1443418930-18677-1-git-send-email-wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-08 3:29 ` Wengang Wang
2015-10-08 4:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20151008043317.GB1940-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-08 4:55 ` Wengang Wang [this message]
[not found] ` <5615F743.5050404-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-08 6:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-20 2:51 Wengang Wang
[not found] ` <1463712711-5556-1-git-send-email-wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-22 11:42 ` Erez Shitrit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5615F743.5050404@oracle.com \
--to=wen.gang.wang-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leon-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).