From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 07/10] iser-target: Declare correct flags when accepting a connection Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:13:13 +0200 Message-ID: <564AFDB9.3070603@mellanox.com> References: <1447691861-3796-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <1447691861-3796-8-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <564ADE63.3030901@mellanox.com> <564AF808.7010404@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <564AF808.7010404-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sagi Grimberg , Sagi Grimberg , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, target-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Steve Wise , Jenny Derzhavetz List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 11/17/2015 11:48 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >>> iser target does not support zero based virtual addresses and >>> send with invalidate, so it should declare that it doesn't. >>> >>> >> >> This better go to stable kernels too, however there's little ugliness >> involved since struct iser_cm_hdr doesn't exist for LIO in those >> kernels, thoughts? > > Umm, I think older kernels will interop just fine as the initiator > considers rdma_cm accepts with no private data as not supporting any > features (remote invalidate, zbva). mmm, maybe we can let it go as you want... so no stabling here. > >> did you get any complaints from probably not Linux initiators >> interop-ing with LIO >> on that matter? > > Nope... Have you? no -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html