From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: device attr cleanup Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: <567169B3.4040908@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <566753E3.9060301@redhat.com> <20151208225940.GB27609@obsidianresearch.com> <56706414.8010807@redhat.com> <5670FC5E.8070405@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5670FC5E.8070405-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz , Doug Ledford Cc: Or Gerlitz , Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Steve Wise List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Hi Doug, > > Lets stop beating, both horses and people. > > I do understand that > > 1. you don't link the removal of the attr > 2. you do like the removal of all the query calls > > I am proposing to take the path of a patch that > does exactly #2 while avoiding #1. I really don't have a strong preference on either of the approaches. I just want to see this included one way or the other. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html