From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haggai Eran Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/3] IB/core: added support to use rdma cgroup controller Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:06:52 +0200 Message-ID: <56D577CC.1070107@mellanox.com> References: <1456668821-25799-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <1456668821-25799-3-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <56D55CE6.7030103@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Parav Pandit Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , raindel-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 01/03/2016 11:22, Parav Pandit wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Haggai Eran wrote: >> On 28/02/2016 16:13, Parav Pandit wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c >>> index 00da80e..54ea8ce 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c >>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c >>> @@ -343,28 +343,38 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device, >>> >>> ret = read_port_immutable(device); >>> if (ret) { >>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "Couldn't create per port immutable data %s\n", >>> - device->name); >>> + pr_warn("Couldn't create per port immutable data %s\n", >>> + device->name); >>> goto out; >> >> This change doesn't belong in the patch. > I agree, but few warnings are with pr_warn and few with printk just > make code look uneven. > So I changed printk to pr_warn in same function instead of spinning > complete new patch. Still, I think it would be better to have such cosmetic changes in a separate patch, so that we have a cleaner git history. You can send this extra patch separately from this patchset so that Doug can take it independently.