From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: oulijun Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:20:52 +0800 Message-ID: <56F28A24.5010107@huawei.com> References: <1458655621-3618-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> <1458655621-3618-3-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> <20160322185412.GA6262@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160322185412.GA6262-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, gongyangming-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, xiaokun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, tangchaofei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, haifeng.wei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, yisen.zhuang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, yankejian-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, lisheng011-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, charles.chenxin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 2016/3/23 2:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 + >> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 + > > To fit in with the other drivers drop the hisilicon level > of the directory hierarchy. > > Haven't had time to look at the actual driver yet so far, though. > > . > Hi Christoph Hellwig, surely, I considered that other drivers will be put into the hisilicon level of the directory hierarchy. These drivers will support RDMA function which will be developed for a series of hisilicon chip. Because of the consideration, I drop the level. In additon that, i thought that the patch of RoCE driver which supported the base function of RDMA is huge. However, It is not splitted into patches in form of patchset. I don't put a better strategy that it neither make mistakes of building and running nor huge. thanks Lijun Ou -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html