From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/core: Don't drain the receive queue for srq attached queue-pair Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:11:07 +0300 Message-ID: <571FBD4B.2030102@grimberg.me> References: <1461682538-19647-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> <571F8D48.4020503@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <571F8D48.4020503-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bart Van Assche , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: Steve Wise , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org >> SRQ attached QPs will fail receive work posts does not >> have a receive queue that needs to be drained, the receive >> queue is shared. > > The patch itself looks fine to me but the description of this patch is > very confusing. Sorry for the poor change log :) I was in a hurry (just now got back) and quickly wrote description and sent out the patch without giving the phrasing any thought. > How about explaining that either an SRQ or an RQ is > attached to a QP and hence that if an SRQ has been attached that there > is no RQ attached and hence that it should not be drained? I'll send out a better description, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html