Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address resolution module into core

[Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1466 bytes --]

On 5/23/2016 4:58 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:36:03PM +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 02:28 PM, Mark Bloch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:59 PM
>>>>> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
>>>>> Cc: Mark Bloch <markb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>; leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; linux-
>>>>> rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address
>>>>> resolution module into core
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/18/2016 01:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:51:02AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
>>>>>>> moves it into the ib_core and also keep the new ib_netlink stuff in
>>>>>>> ib_core.  So, fewer modules, not more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about getting rid of ib_sa as well so we can avoid that dynamic
>>>>>> netlink registration patch too?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's fine too.
>>>> Integrating ib_sa into ib_core also means to do the same for ib_mad.
>>>> If you agree with it (ib_sa & ib_mad becoming part of ib_core), I'll create
>>> the patches.
>>>
>>> Ira, Hal?
>>>
>>
>> I don't see a problem with that.
> 
> Doug,
> 
> Will it be acceptable to you if Mark base his patches on this assumption?

Yes.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 884 bytes --]