From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
matanb@mellanox.com, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/core: Fix different types mix in ib_device_cap_flags structure values
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:04:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574ECF44.3070003@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160531193956.GD21834@obsidianresearch.com>
> The four constants have different types and the types are not
> necessarily what you'd expect (eg FOO_VALUE3 has been promoted to a
> 64 bit signed long, FOO_VALUE1 has been demoted to an int)
>
> So the enum is safe, but having different types of the values is
> certainly unexpected.
>
> I still think the actual bug is only 1<<31 I pointed out earlier:
>
> enum Foo
> {
> FOO_VALUE1 = 1,
> FOO_VALUE2 = ((uint64_t)2) << 32,
> FOO_VALUE3 = 1<<31,
> };
> uint64_t res = FOO_VALUE1 | FOO_VALUE2 | FOO_VALUE3;
> printf("%lx\n",res);
> ==
> ffffffff80000001
>
> Which is clearly wrong. This is because signed int becomes sign
> extended when converted to uint64_t, corrupting the upper bits.
>
> Since adding the ULL's doesn't make the enum constants have uniform
> type I would not bother with the churn.
tested this with single casting to IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING (1 << 31)
to (1ULL << 31). works fine.
I'll send another patch today.
Thanks,
Max.
>
> Jason
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 10:09 [PATCH] IB/core: Fix different types mix in ib_device_cap_flags structure values Max Gurtovoy
2016-05-31 15:36 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <4156c03f-4977-17eb-db64-6df775b6e592-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-31 19:14 ` Max Gurtovoy
[not found] ` <1464602994-21226-1-git-send-email-maxg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-31 15:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-31 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20160531171306.GA6618-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-31 17:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20160531173033.GC7477-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-31 18:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-31 18:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20160531181223.GE7477-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-31 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20160531182100.GC21834-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-31 18:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-05-31 19:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-01 12:04 ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]
[not found] ` <574ECF44.3070003-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-01 15:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-05-31 18:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-31 18:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-05-31 19:16 ` Robert LeBlanc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574ECF44.3070003@mellanox.com \
--to=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matanb@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox