* Race between ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc and ipoib_cm_tx_destroy crashing.
@ 2016-08-11 14:11 Nikolay Borisov
[not found] ` <57AC8799.8060003-6AxghH7DbtA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-08-11 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Doug Ledford, yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA
Hello list,
I've come across yet another ipoib issue. I got the following crash,
while executing "ifdown ib0". At this time the infiniband network was working
as expected (e.g. no issue like the ones I reported before with tx queue
time outs, etc) :
[721677.936044] ib0: timing out; 1 sends not completed
[721678.760114] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ib0: link is not ready
[721678.760337] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready
[721679.081771] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc900358e24d8
[721679.081776] IP: [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib]
[721679.081782] PGD 1fff432067 PUD 3ffec01067 PMD 1e8f064067 PTE 0
[721679.081785] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[721679.081819] CPU: 0 PID: 3451 Comm: qib_cq0 Tainted: G O 4.4.14-clouder3 #26
[721679.081821] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF/X9DRD-7LN4F, BIOS 3.2 01/16/2015
[721679.081822] task: ffff881fee8bb700 ti: ffff881ff0144000 task.ti: ffff881ff0144000
[721679.081823] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01edf20>] [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib]
[721679.081826] RSP: 0000:ffff881fff803e00 EFLAGS: 00010286
[721679.081827] RAX: ffffc900358e24e0 RBX: ffffc900358e24d8 RCX: 0000000000000100
[721679.081828] RDX: 000000000000069b RSI: ffffc900358e24d8 RDI: ffff881ff25c8700
[721679.081829] RBP: ffff881fff803e30 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: ffffc9001b7df000
[721679.081830] R10: 00000000000aebb9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[721679.081831] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff881ff25c8700 R15: ffff881ff25c8000
[721679.081832] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff881fff800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[721679.081833] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[721679.081834] CR2: ffffc900358e24d8 CR3: 0000001fa3b4f000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
[721679.081834] Stack:
[721679.081835] 0000000000000000 ffffc900358e24d8 0000000000000000 ffff881fdf4b2c00
[721679.081837] 0000000000000000 ffff881ff25c8000 ffff881fff803e80 ffffffffa01f5660
[721679.081839] ffff881ff25c9068 0000000040000059 ffff881ff25c8700 ffff881ff25c8710
[721679.081840] Call Trace:
[721679.081842] <IRQ>
[721679.081845] [<ffffffffa01f5660>] ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc+0x70/0x280 [ib_ipoib]
[721679.081848] [<ffffffffa01ee487>] ipoib_poll+0xd7/0x160 [ib_ipoib]
[721679.081852] [<ffffffff8154d36c>] net_rx_action+0x1ec/0x330
[721679.081855] [<ffffffff81057337>] __do_softirq+0x147/0x310
[721679.081866] [<ffffffffa00b601f>] ? send_complete+0x1f/0x60 [ib_qib]
[721679.081869] [<ffffffff8161618c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30
[721679.081869] <EOI>
[721679.081871] [<ffffffff810567bb>] do_softirq.part.17+0x3b/0x40
[721679.081873] [<ffffffff81056876>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xc0
[721679.081877] [<ffffffffa00b604b>] send_complete+0x4b/0x60 [ib_qib]
[721679.081881] [<ffffffff81071bdb>] kthread_worker_fn+0xbb/0x1e0
[721679.081883] [<ffffffff81071b20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
[721679.081885] [<ffffffff8107161f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
[721679.081887] [<ffffffff81071530>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[721679.081889] [<ffffffff816149ff>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[721679.081891] [<ffffffff81071530>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[721679.081892] Code: 48 8b 05 b4 63 a2 e1 eb a3 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 8d 46 08 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 49 89 fe 41 55 45 31 ed 41 54 53 48 83 ec 08 <4c> 8b 3e 48 89 45 d0 41 8b 97 80 00 00 00 41 8b 87 84 00 00 00
[721679.081909] RIP [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib]
[721679.081911] RSP <ffff881fff803e00>
[721679.081912] CR2: ffffc900358e24d8
ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20 is : struct sk_buff *skb = tx_req->skb;
The address of tx_req is ffffc900358e24d8, which apparently
is unmapped address.
The warning message "ib0: timing out; 1 sends not completed",
came from ipoib_cm_tx_destroy. This means the "goto timeout"
statement has executed, triggering the freeing of the ipoib_cm_tx
state, eventually unmapping the vmalloced. At the time of the crash ipoib_cm_tx looks like:
struct ipoib_cm_tx {
id = 0xffff881fdf4b2c60,
qp = 0xffff8801c0bc8000,
list = {
next = 0xdead000000000100,
prev = 0xdead000000000200
},
dev = 0xffff881ff25c8000,
neigh = 0x0,
path = 0xffff881f3f7a7500,
tx_ring = 0xffffc900358df000,
tx_head = 101722,
tx_tail = 101722,
flags = 1,
mtu = 65524
}
The list is dead which corresponds to the list_del(&p->list);
in cm_tx_reap and the tx_head/tx_tail are equal, corresponding
to the loop in ipoib_cm_tx_destroy.
Reading the code in ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc I wasn't able to figure out
how is this function synchronized against parallel destruction of
underlying ipoib_cm_tx, which seems to be the case here.
Regards,
Nikolay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <57AC8799.8060003-6AxghH7DbtA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Race between ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc and ipoib_cm_tx_destroy crashing. [not found] ` <57AC8799.8060003-6AxghH7DbtA@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-08-11 15:10 ` Erez Shitrit [not found] ` <CAAk-MO8ftavVagQSXte_7yRf=iwHRXk-123wWRmmJELW+RVC7Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Erez Shitrit @ 2016-08-11 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Doug Ledford, Yuval Shaia On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Nikolay Borisov <kernel-6AxghH7DbtA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Hello list, > > I've come across yet another ipoib issue. I got the following crash, > while executing "ifdown ib0". At this time the infiniband network was working > as expected (e.g. no issue like the ones I reported before with tx queue > time outs, etc) : > I think, it is all in the same area (as i already told you), somehow there are missing events from the FW. The scenario here can be explained by hanged/delayed FW/HW, please see below: > [721677.936044] ib0: timing out; 1 sends not completed The driver waits for 5 sec for completions from the HW/FW, they didn't come, so the driver cleans all the skb including the dma mapping. > [721678.760114] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ib0: link is not ready > [721678.760337] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready > [721679.081771] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc900358e24d8 > [721679.081776] IP: [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib] > [721679.081782] PGD 1fff432067 PUD 3ffec01067 PMD 1e8f064067 PTE 0 > [721679.081785] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > [721679.081819] CPU: 0 PID: 3451 Comm: qib_cq0 Tainted: G O 4.4.14-clouder3 #26 > [721679.081821] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF/X9DRD-7LN4F, BIOS 3.2 01/16/2015 > [721679.081822] task: ffff881fee8bb700 ti: ffff881ff0144000 task.ti: ffff881ff0144000 > [721679.081823] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01edf20>] [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib] > [721679.081826] RSP: 0000:ffff881fff803e00 EFLAGS: 00010286 > [721679.081827] RAX: ffffc900358e24e0 RBX: ffffc900358e24d8 RCX: 0000000000000100 > [721679.081828] RDX: 000000000000069b RSI: ffffc900358e24d8 RDI: ffff881ff25c8700 > [721679.081829] RBP: ffff881fff803e30 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: ffffc9001b7df000 > [721679.081830] R10: 00000000000aebb9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 > [721679.081831] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff881ff25c8700 R15: ffff881ff25c8000 > [721679.081832] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff881fff800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [721679.081833] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [721679.081834] CR2: ffffc900358e24d8 CR3: 0000001fa3b4f000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 > [721679.081834] Stack: > [721679.081835] 0000000000000000 ffffc900358e24d8 0000000000000000 ffff881fdf4b2c00 > [721679.081837] 0000000000000000 ffff881ff25c8000 ffff881fff803e80 ffffffffa01f5660 > [721679.081839] ffff881ff25c9068 0000000040000059 ffff881ff25c8700 ffff881ff25c8710 > [721679.081840] Call Trace: > [721679.081842] <IRQ> > [721679.081845] [<ffffffffa01f5660>] ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc+0x70/0x280 [ib_ipoib] meanwhile the HW/FW returned the completion event of the send (after the driver was waiting for it during 5 sec, and deleted that skb) napi was called and the driver tries to unmap memory area that was already was freed .. -->>panic > [721679.081848] [<ffffffffa01ee487>] ipoib_poll+0xd7/0x160 [ib_ipoib] > [721679.081852] [<ffffffff8154d36c>] net_rx_action+0x1ec/0x330 > [721679.081855] [<ffffffff81057337>] __do_softirq+0x147/0x310 > [721679.081866] [<ffffffffa00b601f>] ? send_complete+0x1f/0x60 [ib_qib] > [721679.081869] [<ffffffff8161618c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30 > [721679.081869] <EOI> > [721679.081871] [<ffffffff810567bb>] do_softirq.part.17+0x3b/0x40 > [721679.081873] [<ffffffff81056876>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xc0 > [721679.081877] [<ffffffffa00b604b>] send_complete+0x4b/0x60 [ib_qib] > [721679.081881] [<ffffffff81071bdb>] kthread_worker_fn+0xbb/0x1e0 > [721679.081883] [<ffffffff81071b20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 > [721679.081885] [<ffffffff8107161f>] kthread+0xef/0x110 > [721679.081887] [<ffffffff81071530>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 > [721679.081889] [<ffffffff816149ff>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 > [721679.081891] [<ffffffff81071530>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 > [721679.081892] Code: 48 8b 05 b4 63 a2 e1 eb a3 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 8d 46 08 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 49 89 fe 41 55 45 31 ed 41 54 53 48 83 ec 08 <4c> 8b 3e 48 89 45 d0 41 8b 97 80 00 00 00 41 8b 87 84 00 00 00 > [721679.081909] RIP [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib] > [721679.081911] RSP <ffff881fff803e00> > [721679.081912] CR2: ffffc900358e24d8 > > ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20 is : struct sk_buff *skb = tx_req->skb; > The address of tx_req is ffffc900358e24d8, which apparently > is unmapped address. > > The warning message "ib0: timing out; 1 sends not completed", > came from ipoib_cm_tx_destroy. This means the "goto timeout" > statement has executed, triggering the freeing of the ipoib_cm_tx > state, eventually unmapping the vmalloced. At the time of the crash ipoib_cm_tx looks like: > > struct ipoib_cm_tx { > id = 0xffff881fdf4b2c60, > qp = 0xffff8801c0bc8000, > list = { > next = 0xdead000000000100, > prev = 0xdead000000000200 > }, > dev = 0xffff881ff25c8000, > neigh = 0x0, > path = 0xffff881f3f7a7500, > tx_ring = 0xffffc900358df000, > tx_head = 101722, > tx_tail = 101722, > flags = 1, > mtu = 65524 > } > > The list is dead which corresponds to the list_del(&p->list); > in cm_tx_reap and the tx_head/tx_tail are equal, corresponding > to the loop in ipoib_cm_tx_destroy. > > Reading the code in ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc I wasn't able to figure out > how is this function synchronized against parallel destruction of > underlying ipoib_cm_tx, which seems to be the case here. I think you need some debug from the HW/FW here. > > Regards, > Nikolay > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAAk-MO8ftavVagQSXte_7yRf=iwHRXk-123wWRmmJELW+RVC7Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Race between ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc and ipoib_cm_tx_destroy crashing. [not found] ` <CAAk-MO8ftavVagQSXte_7yRf=iwHRXk-123wWRmmJELW+RVC7Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-08-11 15:39 ` Nikolay Borisov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-08-11 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Erez Shitrit Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Doug Ledford, Yuval Shaia On 08/11/2016 06:10 PM, Erez Shitrit wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Nikolay Borisov <kernel-6AxghH7DbtA@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I've come across yet another ipoib issue. I got the following crash, >> while executing "ifdown ib0". At this time the infiniband network was working >> as expected (e.g. no issue like the ones I reported before with tx queue >> time outs, etc) : >> > > I think, it is all in the same area (as i already told you), somehow > there are missing events from the FW. > > The scenario here can be explained by hanged/delayed FW/HW, please see below: > >> [721677.936044] ib0: timing out; 1 sends not completed > > The driver waits for 5 sec for completions from the HW/FW, they didn't > come, so the driver cleans all the skb including the dma mapping. > >> [721678.760114] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ib0: link is not ready >> [721678.760337] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ib0: link becomes ready >> [721679.081771] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc900358e24d8 >> [721679.081776] IP: [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib] >> [721679.081782] PGD 1fff432067 PUD 3ffec01067 PMD 1e8f064067 PTE 0 >> [721679.081785] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP >> [721679.081819] CPU: 0 PID: 3451 Comm: qib_cq0 Tainted: G O 4.4.14-clouder3 #26 >> [721679.081821] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF/X9DRD-7LN4F, BIOS 3.2 01/16/2015 >> [721679.081822] task: ffff881fee8bb700 ti: ffff881ff0144000 task.ti: ffff881ff0144000 >> [721679.081823] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01edf20>] [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib] >> [721679.081826] RSP: 0000:ffff881fff803e00 EFLAGS: 00010286 >> [721679.081827] RAX: ffffc900358e24e0 RBX: ffffc900358e24d8 RCX: 0000000000000100 >> [721679.081828] RDX: 000000000000069b RSI: ffffc900358e24d8 RDI: ffff881ff25c8700 >> [721679.081829] RBP: ffff881fff803e30 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: ffffc9001b7df000 >> [721679.081830] R10: 00000000000aebb9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 >> [721679.081831] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff881ff25c8700 R15: ffff881ff25c8000 >> [721679.081832] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff881fff800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >> [721679.081833] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> [721679.081834] CR2: ffffc900358e24d8 CR3: 0000001fa3b4f000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 >> [721679.081834] Stack: >> [721679.081835] 0000000000000000 ffffc900358e24d8 0000000000000000 ffff881fdf4b2c00 >> [721679.081837] 0000000000000000 ffff881ff25c8000 ffff881fff803e80 ffffffffa01f5660 >> [721679.081839] ffff881ff25c9068 0000000040000059 ffff881ff25c8700 ffff881ff25c8710 >> [721679.081840] Call Trace: >> [721679.081842] <IRQ> >> [721679.081845] [<ffffffffa01f5660>] ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc+0x70/0x280 [ib_ipoib] > > meanwhile the HW/FW returned the completion event of the send (after > the driver was waiting for it during 5 sec, and deleted that skb) > napi was called and the driver tries to unmap memory area that was > already was freed .. > > -->>panic But even then I think the current design is problematic, because when napi is called on an-already freed skb/state it should be able to detect that and just do nothing. Otherwise we can get such a situation and kill the whole machine. Even if the ib is not operational for whatever reason it shouldn't be killing the whole machine. > >> [721679.081848] [<ffffffffa01ee487>] ipoib_poll+0xd7/0x160 [ib_ipoib] >> [721679.081852] [<ffffffff8154d36c>] net_rx_action+0x1ec/0x330 >> [721679.081855] [<ffffffff81057337>] __do_softirq+0x147/0x310 >> [721679.081866] [<ffffffffa00b601f>] ? send_complete+0x1f/0x60 [ib_qib] >> [721679.081869] [<ffffffff8161618c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30 >> [721679.081869] <EOI> >> [721679.081871] [<ffffffff810567bb>] do_softirq.part.17+0x3b/0x40 >> [721679.081873] [<ffffffff81056876>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xc0 >> [721679.081877] [<ffffffffa00b604b>] send_complete+0x4b/0x60 [ib_qib] >> [721679.081881] [<ffffffff81071bdb>] kthread_worker_fn+0xbb/0x1e0 >> [721679.081883] [<ffffffff81071b20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 >> [721679.081885] [<ffffffff8107161f>] kthread+0xef/0x110 >> [721679.081887] [<ffffffff81071530>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 >> [721679.081889] [<ffffffff816149ff>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 >> [721679.081891] [<ffffffff81071530>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 >> [721679.081892] Code: 48 8b 05 b4 63 a2 e1 eb a3 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 8d 46 08 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 49 89 fe 41 55 45 31 ed 41 54 53 48 83 ec 08 <4c> 8b 3e 48 89 45 d0 41 8b 97 80 00 00 00 41 8b 87 84 00 00 00 >> [721679.081909] RIP [<ffffffffa01edf20>] ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20/0x170 [ib_ipoib] >> [721679.081911] RSP <ffff881fff803e00> >> [721679.081912] CR2: ffffc900358e24d8 >> >> ipoib_dma_unmap_tx+0x20 is : struct sk_buff *skb = tx_req->skb; >> The address of tx_req is ffffc900358e24d8, which apparently >> is unmapped address. >> >> The warning message "ib0: timing out; 1 sends not completed", >> came from ipoib_cm_tx_destroy. This means the "goto timeout" >> statement has executed, triggering the freeing of the ipoib_cm_tx >> state, eventually unmapping the vmalloced. At the time of the crash ipoib_cm_tx looks like: >> >> struct ipoib_cm_tx { >> id = 0xffff881fdf4b2c60, >> qp = 0xffff8801c0bc8000, >> list = { >> next = 0xdead000000000100, >> prev = 0xdead000000000200 >> }, >> dev = 0xffff881ff25c8000, >> neigh = 0x0, >> path = 0xffff881f3f7a7500, >> tx_ring = 0xffffc900358df000, >> tx_head = 101722, >> tx_tail = 101722, >> flags = 1, >> mtu = 65524 >> } >> >> The list is dead which corresponds to the list_del(&p->list); >> in cm_tx_reap and the tx_head/tx_tail are equal, corresponding >> to the loop in ipoib_cm_tx_destroy. >> >> Reading the code in ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc I wasn't able to figure out >> how is this function synchronized against parallel destruction of >> underlying ipoib_cm_tx, which seems to be the case here. > > I think you need some debug from the HW/FW here -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-11 15:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-11 14:11 Race between ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc and ipoib_cm_tx_destroy crashing Nikolay Borisov
[not found] ` <57AC8799.8060003-6AxghH7DbtA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-11 15:10 ` Erez Shitrit
[not found] ` <CAAk-MO8ftavVagQSXte_7yRf=iwHRXk-123wWRmmJELW+RVC7Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-11 15:39 ` Nikolay Borisov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox