From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:53:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58c544cb206d94b759ff0546bcffe693c3cbfb98.1644323503.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1644323503.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
In multithread and 10K connections benchmark, the backend TCP connection
established very slowly, and lots of TCP connections stay in SYN_SENT
state.
Client: smc_run wrk -c 10000 -t 4 http://server
the netstate of server host shows like:
145042 times the listen queue of a socket overflowed
145042 SYNs to LISTEN sockets dropped
One reason of this issue is that, since the smc_tcp_listen_work() shared
the same workqueue (smc_hs_wq) with smc_listen_work(), while the
smc_listen_work() do blocking wait for smc connection established. Once
the workqueue became congested, it's will block the accept() from TCP
listen.
This patch creates a independent workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq) for
smc_tcp_listen_work(), separate it from smc_listen_work(), which is
quite acceptable considering that smc_tcp_listen_work() runs very fast.
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 00b2e9d..4969ac8 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
* creation on client
*/
+static struct workqueue_struct *smc_tcp_ls_wq; /* wq for tcp listen work */
struct workqueue_struct *smc_hs_wq; /* wq for handshake work */
struct workqueue_struct *smc_close_wq; /* wq for close work */
@@ -2227,7 +2228,7 @@ static void smc_clcsock_data_ready(struct sock *listen_clcsock)
lsmc->clcsk_data_ready(listen_clcsock);
if (lsmc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) {
sock_hold(&lsmc->sk); /* sock_put in smc_tcp_listen_work() */
- if (!queue_work(smc_hs_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work))
+ if (!queue_work(smc_tcp_ls_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work))
sock_put(&lsmc->sk);
}
}
@@ -3024,9 +3025,14 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
goto out_nl;
rc = -ENOMEM;
+
+ smc_tcp_ls_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_tcp_ls_wq", 0, 0);
+ if (!smc_tcp_ls_wq)
+ goto out_pnet;
+
smc_hs_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_hs_wq", 0, 0);
if (!smc_hs_wq)
- goto out_pnet;
+ goto out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq;
smc_close_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_close_wq", 0, 0);
if (!smc_close_wq)
@@ -3097,6 +3103,8 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
destroy_workqueue(smc_close_wq);
out_alloc_hs_wq:
destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq);
+out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq:
+ destroy_workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq);
out_pnet:
smc_pnet_exit();
out_nl:
@@ -3115,6 +3123,7 @@ static void __exit smc_exit(void)
smc_core_exit();
smc_ib_unregister_client();
destroy_workqueue(smc_close_wq);
+ destroy_workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq);
destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq);
proto_unregister(&smc_proto6);
proto_unregister(&smc_proto);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 12:53 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] net/smc: Optimizing performance in short-lived scenarios D. Wythe
2022-02-08 12:53 ` D. Wythe [this message]
2022-02-08 17:06 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent Karsten Graul
2022-02-09 6:24 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-08 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] net/smc: Limit backlog connections D. Wythe
2022-02-08 17:13 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-09 7:11 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-09 7:56 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-08 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] net/smc: Fallback when handshake workqueue congested D. Wythe
2022-02-08 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] net/smc: Dynamic control auto fallback by socket options D. Wythe
2022-02-08 17:08 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-09 6:41 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-09 7:59 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-09 9:01 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-08 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] net/smc: Add global configure for auto fallback by netlink D. Wythe
2022-02-09 9:16 ` Tony Lu
2022-02-09 9:53 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-09 11:37 ` Tony Lu
2022-02-09 9:33 ` Tony Lu
2022-02-09 9:41 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-09 9:54 ` Tony Lu
2022-02-09 10:56 ` D. Wythe
2022-02-08 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] net/smc: Optimizing performance in short-lived scenarios Karsten Graul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58c544cb206d94b759ff0546bcffe693c3cbfb98.1644323503.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox