From: "yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
To: RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: Re: [rdma-core PATCH] providers/rxe: Replace '%' with '&' in check_qp_queue_full()
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:02:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61E6823E.9090808@fujitsu.com> (raw)
CC: linux-rdma mail list
On 2022/1/14 4:51, Bob Pearson wrote:
> The way these queues work they can only hold 2^n - 1 entries. The reason for this is
> to distinguish empty and full. If you let the last entry be written then producer would advance to equal consumer which is the initial empty condition. So a queue which can hold 1 entry has to have two slots (n=1) but can only hold one entry. It begins with
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your detailed example.
> prod = cons = 0 and is empty and is*not* full
>
> Adding one entry gives
>
> slot[0] = value, prod = 1, cons = 0 and is full and not empty
>
> After reading this value
>
> slot[0] = old value, prod = cons = 1 and queue is empty again.
>
> Writing a new value
>
> slot[1] = new value, slot[0] = old value, prod = 0 and cons = 1 and queue is full again.
>
> The expression full = (cons == ((qp->cur_index + 1) % q->index_mask)) is correct.
The issue happens here, let's look at the "writing a new value" step.
We think queue is full again when prod = 0 and cons = 1, but this
expression thinks the queue is not full.
cons == ((qp->cur_index + 1) % q->index_mask))
<1> == <0 + 1> % <1>
In addition, this expression thinks the queue is full wrongly when we
create an empty two-slots queue (i.e. prod = 0 and cons = 0).
cons == ((qp->cur_index + 1) % q->index_mask))
<0> == <0 + 1> % <1>
The following steps can expose the issue:
-------------------------------------------
attr_ex.cap.max_send_wr = attr_ex.cap.max_recv_wr = 1;
...
ret = rdma_create_qp_ex(id, &attr_ex);
...
ibv_wr_start(qpx);
ibv_wr_rdma_atomic_write(qpx,...); --> check_qp_queue_full() returns
ENOSPC wrongly.
ibv_wr_complete(qpx);
-------------------------------------------
Please see my example[1] for details.
[1]
https://github.com/yangx-jy/rdma-core/commit/257c6672dc147e0881525e469a49d933f1bc9183
I think the commit message misled you.
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
> Please do not make this change.
>
> Bob
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 9:02 yangx.jy [this message]
2022-01-20 5:08 ` Fwd: Re: [rdma-core PATCH] providers/rxe: Replace '%' with '&' in check_qp_queue_full() Bob Pearson
2022-01-21 6:20 ` yangx.jy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61E6823E.9090808@fujitsu.com \
--to=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).