From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5: avoid frame overflow warning
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 22:14:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6356ebf5-b89e-4769-ad0f-fcf0cf3e9d9f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612201611.4127750-1-arnd@kernel.org>
在 2026/6/12 13:15, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Building mlx5 on s390 shows a rather high stack usage that can exceed
> the warning limit when that is set to a lower but still reasonable value:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c:1051:5: error: stack frame size (1328) exceeds limit (1280) in 'mlx5_ib_post_send' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
>
> The problem here is 'struct ib_reg_wr' on the stack of
> handle_reg_mr_integrity(), which gets inlined into mlx5_ib_post_send()
> along with a number of smaller functions.
>
> Keeping the inner function out of line like gcc does avoids the
> warning and reduces the total stack usage in other functions called
> from mlx5_ib_post_send(), though handle_reg_mr_integrity() itself
> still has the same problem as before.
IMO, it is just a workaround to this problem. To fix this problem, the
function set_reg_wr should be rewritten.
Zhu Yanjun
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> Dynamically allocating ib_reg_wr would be another option, actually
> reducing the stack usage but adding a little bit of complexity
> from error handling.
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c
> index 9947feb7fb8a..fca9e1d9d5e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c
> @@ -840,13 +840,15 @@ static int handle_psv(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int handle_reg_mr_integrity(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
> - struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp,
> - const struct ib_send_wr *wr,
> - struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg **ctrl, void **seg,
> - int *size, void **cur_edge,
> - unsigned int *idx, int nreq, u8 fence,
> - u8 next_fence)
> +static noinline_for_stack int handle_reg_mr_integrity(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
> + struct mlx5_ib_qp *qp,
> + const struct ib_send_wr *wr,
> + struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg **ctrl,
> + void **seg,
> + int *size, void **cur_edge,
> + unsigned int *idx, int nreq,
> + u8 fence,
> + u8 next_fence)
> {
> struct mlx5_ib_mr *mr;
> struct mlx5_ib_mr *pi_mr;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 20:15 [PATCH] mlx5: avoid frame overflow warning Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-13 5:14 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6356ebf5-b89e-4769-ad0f-fcf0cf3e9d9f@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox