From: "Håkon Bugge" <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Mark Haywood <mark.haywood@oracle.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is there a working cache for path record and lids etc for librdmacm?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:01:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <648D2533-E8E8-4248-AF2D-C5F1F60E5BFC@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011231244490.272074@www.lameter.com>
> On 23 Nov 2020, at 13:50, Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, Christopher Lameter wrote:
>
>>> If you set acme_plus_kernel_only to one in said config file, you app will resolve the address using the kernel neighbour cache and the route resolution will go into the kernel and then "bounce" back to user space and ibacm through NetLink.
>>
>> Have not seen that in the RHEL7.8 version of ibacm.
>>
>
> Got version 33.0 from Redhat with the option. Set it but ibacm still times
> out when trying to contact the SM.
Contact the peer ibacm, that is. Is it started?
And, ib_acme bypasses the kernel_only check. I assume a real app (e.g., qperf <destination_ip> -cm1 rc_bw) would work, but incur an excess delay due to the ibacm timeout, before failing back to the kernel neighbour cache.
Thxs, Håkon
>
> ib_acme says:
>
> ib_acm_resolve_ip failed: Connection timed out
>
>
> ibmacm.log says
>
> acmp_process_wait_queue: notice - failing request
> acmp_process_timeouts: notice - dest 192.168.50.39
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 2:57 Is there a working cache for path record and lids etc for librdmacm? Christopher Lameter
2020-11-17 8:46 ` Jens Domke
2020-11-17 14:20 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-17 19:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-20 18:05 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-20 18:34 ` Håkon Bugge
2020-11-22 12:49 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-22 15:50 ` Håkon Bugge
2020-11-22 19:22 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-23 12:50 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-23 19:01 ` Håkon Bugge [this message]
2020-11-24 19:01 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-25 8:10 ` Honggang LI
2020-11-25 16:43 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-11-27 14:52 ` Håkon Bugge
2020-11-30 8:24 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-12-04 11:17 ` Håkon Bugge
2020-12-05 11:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2020-12-07 10:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2020-12-07 21:08 ` Mark Haywood
2020-12-08 8:59 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=648D2533-E8E8-4248-AF2D-C5F1F60E5BFC@oracle.com \
--to=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.haywood@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox