From: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, borisp@nvidia.com,
shayd@nvidia.com, msanalla@nvidia.com,
Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>,
weizhang@nvidia.com, kliteyn@nvidia.com, erezsh@nvidia.com,
igozlan@nvidia.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [question] when bonding with CX5 network card that support ROCE
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 12:58:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a285586-0a11-43be-a07a-5ba0b92d0ee6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb68fc32-9c6c-ceda-a961-f4fde72ce64d@huawei.com>
On 06.05.24 12:45, shaozhengchao wrote:
> Hi yanjun:
> The following is the command output after the cat /proc/net/bonding
> /bond0 command is run:
If I remember it correctly, it seems that it is a rdma LAG and bonding
problem.
Not sure if it is a known problem or not. Please contact your local support.
Zhu Yanjun
> [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v5.10.0+
>
> Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
> Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
> MII Status: up
> MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
> Up Delay (ms): 0
> Down Delay (ms): 0
> Peer Notification Delay (ms): 0
>
> 802.3ad info
> LACP rate: slow
> Min links: 0
> Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable
> System priority: 65535
> System MAC address: f4:1d:6b:6f:3b:97
> Active Aggregator Info:
> Aggregator ID: 2
> Number of ports: 1
> Actor Key: 23
> Partner Key: 1
> Partner Mac Address: 00:00:00:00:00:00
>
> Slave Interface: enp145s0f0
> MII Status: up
> Speed: 40000 Mbps
> Duplex: full
> Link Failure Count: 1
> Permanent HW addr: f4:1d:6b:6f:3b:97
> Slave queue ID: 0
> Aggregator ID: 1
> Actor Churn State: churned
> Partner Churn State: churned
> Actor Churned Count: 1
> Partner Churned Count: 2
> details actor lacp pdu:
> system priority: 65535
> system mac address: f4:1d:6b:6f:3b:97
> port key: 23
> port priority: 255
> port number: 1
> port state: 69
> details partner lacp pdu:
> system priority: 65535
> system mac address: 00:00:00:00:00:00
> oper key: 1
> port priority: 255
> port number: 1
> port state: 1
>
> Slave Interface: enp145s0f1
> MII Status: up
> Speed: 40000 Mbps
> Duplex: full
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: f4:1d:6b:6f:3b:98
> Slave queue ID: 0
> Aggregator ID: 2
> Actor Churn State: none
> Partner Churn State: churned
> Actor Churned Count: 0
> Partner Churned Count: 1
> details actor lacp pdu:
> system priority: 65535
> system mac address: f4:1d:6b:6f:3b:97
> port key: 23
> port priority: 255
> port number: 2
> port state: 77
> details partner lacp pdu:
> system priority: 65535
> system mac address: 00:00:00:00:00:00
> oper key: 1
> port priority: 255
> port number: 1
> port state: 1
>
> Thank you
> Zhengchao Shao
>
>
> On 2024/5/6 16:26, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> On 06.05.24 06:46, shaozhengchao wrote:
>>>
>>> When using the 5.10 kernel, I can find two IB devices using the
>>> ibv_devinfo command.
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> [root@localhost ~]# lspci
>>> 91:00.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family
>>> [ConnectX-5]
>>> 91:00.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> [root@localhost ~]# ibv_devinfo
>>> hca_id: mlx5_0
>>> transport: InfiniBand (0)
>>> fw_ver: 16.31.1014
>>> node_guid: f41d:6b03:006f:4743
>>> sys_image_guid: f41d:6b03:006f:4743
>>> vendor_id: 0x02c9
>>> vendor_part_id: 4119
>>> hw_ver: 0x0
>>> board_id: HUA0000000004
>>> phys_port_cnt: 1
>>> port: 1
>>> state: PORT_ACTIVE (4)
>>> max_mtu: 4096 (5)
>>> active_mtu: 1024 (3)
>>> sm_lid: 0
>>> port_lid: 0
>>> port_lmc: 0x00
>>> link_layer: Ethernet
>>>
>>> hca_id: mlx5_1
>>> transport: InfiniBand (0)
>>> fw_ver: 16.31.1014
>>> node_guid: f41d:6b03:006f:4744
>>> sys_image_guid: f41d:6b03:006f:4743
>>> vendor_id: 0x02c9
>>> vendor_part_id: 4119
>>> hw_ver: 0x0
>>> board_id: HUA0000000004
>>> phys_port_cnt: 1
>>> port: 1
>>> state: PORT_ACTIVE (4)
>>> max_mtu: 4096 (5)
>>> active_mtu: 1024 (3)
>>> sm_lid: 0
>>> port_lid: 0
>>> port_lmc: 0x00
>>> link_layer: Ethernet
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> But after the two network ports are bonded, only one IB device is
>>> available, and only PF0 can be used.
>>> [root@localhost shaozhengchao]# ibv_devinfo
>>> hca_id: mlx5_bond_0
>>> transport: InfiniBand (0)
>>> fw_ver: 16.31.1014
>>> node_guid: f41d:6b03:006f:4743
>>> sys_image_guid: f41d:6b03:006f:4743
>>> vendor_id: 0x02c9
>>> vendor_part_id: 4119
>>> hw_ver: 0x0
>>> board_id: HUA0000000004
>>> phys_port_cnt: 1
>>> port: 1
>>> state: PORT_ACTIVE (4)
>>> max_mtu: 4096 (5)
>>> active_mtu: 1024 (3)
>>> sm_lid: 0
>>> port_lid: 0
>>> port_lmc: 0x00
>>> link_layer: Ethernet
>>>
>>> The current Linux mainline driver is the same.
>>>
>>> I found the comment ("If bonded, we do not add an IB device for PF1.")
>>> in the mlx5_lag_intf_add function of the 5.10 branch driver code.
>>
>> Not sure if rdma lag is enabled for this or not. /proc/net/bonding
>> will provide more more details normally.
>>
>> Zhu Yanjun
>>
>>> This indicates that wthe the same NIC is used, only PF0 support
>>> bonding?
>>> Are there any other constraints, when enable bonding with CX5?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Zhengchao Shao
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-06 4:46 [question] when bonding with CX5 network card that support ROCE shaozhengchao
2024-05-06 8:26 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-06 10:45 ` shaozhengchao
2024-05-06 10:58 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2024-05-06 11:33 ` shaozhengchao
2024-05-06 12:27 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-07 1:23 ` shaozhengchao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a285586-0a11-43be-a07a-5ba0b92d0ee6@gmail.com \
--to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=erezsh@nvidia.com \
--cc=igozlan@nvidia.com \
--cc=kliteyn@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msanalla@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=weizhang@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox